On June 30, 2017 a
Exhibit,Appendix
was filed
involving a dispute between
Drisonline.Com Inc,
and
Agraharkar, Mahendra,
Choudhry, Ajay,
Gomes, Andrew,
National Interventional Radiology Partners Management Llc,
Nirp Management Llc,
Nirp Pasadena Pllc,
Nirp Sugarland Pllc,
for FRAUD
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
Re: slide deck 3
20f4
with high end expensive technology that nobody knows how to use correctly? With a futile
attempt at one Tech support person having to try to change and adjust every setting for
everyone, help with recovering lost passwords (I'd love to dollarize the inefficiency from this
alone, |'ll bet it's in the hundreds of millions), etc? We use a screening assessment for all new
hires -- it has nothing to do with healthcare, it's all about technology -- e.g. what email account
do you use and why, what is your email response time, which personal calendar do you
maintain, which smartphone do you have and why. There is a strong correlation b/w how well
one performs on this and how well they work in a radiology setting. Do it this way and labor
costs and turnover plummet.
5. Operational Costs per procedure - addressed above, this goes down dramatically. Like Henry
Ford took cars from 12 hours and $3000 to 2 hours and $800.
6. Patient TAT - This too will be shortened significantly, but because this involves a biped physically
moving around it can't/won't be a 5-10 fold improvement like many other facets of the business
will
We don't have that metric for MRI only, but the average longterm per procedure revenue:cost we
have computed thus far is 1220:748 i.e. $472 net profit per case. But we definitely need the help of
financial experts to fine-tune this further
Andrew
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Sam Alam wrote:
Andrew: | love your passion —| have reviewed all three slide decks ~ great presentation to show efficiency from
MD's point of view. Correct me if tam wrong.
1. You are saying that “Reading Fees” can be lowered and the savings can be passed on (subsidy) to hospitals?
2. Your pitch is Quality, Efficiency (by radiologists) and Faster thruput (with regard to dictating and sending
results).
3. Isn't this the gist of all three decks. Did | miss something?
You are on the right track and surely, as a Radiologist you have control over the reading fees and sending of patient
results ~ but the complexity kicks in with respect to the cost of equipment, upkeep, downtime, supplies, labor cost,
operational cost per procedure, and patient turn-around time — don’t you think?.
Do you know the Procedure Cost of ane MRI and do you know the reimbursement (or your price structure) for one
MRI? Add that to the equation and see what you get.
Sam Alam
AG000268
12/20/2019, 5:53 PM
Document Filed Date
February 07, 2022
Case Filing Date
June 30, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Re: slide deck 3 20f4 with high end expensive technology that nobody knows how to use correctly? With a futile attempt at one Tech support person having to try to change and adjust every setting for everyone, help with recovering lost passwords (I'd love to dollarize the inefficiency from this alone, |'ll bet it's in the hundreds of millions), etc? We use a screening assessment for all new hires -- it has nothing to do with healthcare, it's all about technology -- e.g. what email account do you use and why, what is your email response time, which personal calendar do you maintain, which smartphone do you have and why. There is a strong correlation b/w how well one performs on this and how well they work in a radiology setting. Do it this way and labor costs and turnover plummet. 5. Operational Costs per procedure - addressed above, this goes down dramatically. Like Henry Ford took cars from 12 hours and $3000 to 2 hours and $800. 6. Patient TAT - This too will be shortened significantly, but because this involves a biped physically moving around it can't/won't be a 5-10 fold improvement like many other facets of the business will We don't have that metric for MRI only, but the average longterm per procedure revenue:cost we have computed thus far is 1220:748 i.e. $472 net profit per case. But we definitely need the help of financial experts to fine-tune this further Andrew On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Sam Alam wrote: Andrew: | love your passion —| have reviewed all three slide decks ~ great presentation to show efficiency from MD's point of view. Correct me if tam wrong. 1. You are saying that “Reading Fees” can be lowered and the savings can be passed on (subsidy) to hospitals? 2. Your pitch is Quality, Efficiency (by radiologists) and Faster thruput (with regard to dictating and sending results). 3. Isn't this the gist of all three decks. Did | miss something? You are on the right track and surely, as a Radiologist you have control over the reading fees and sending of patient results ~ but the complexity kicks in with respect to the cost of equipment, upkeep, downtime, supplies, labor cost, operational cost per procedure, and patient turn-around time — don’t you think?. Do you know the Procedure Cost of ane MRI and do you know the reimbursement (or your price structure) for one MRI? Add that to the equation and see what you get. Sam Alam AG000268 12/20/2019, 5:53 PM