On October 05, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hill, Lisa,
and
Quaid Harley-Davidson, Inc. A California Corporation,
for Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT SUchw-j
F (g.
L- ~E D .
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO 601R}? Sggfirg Fggfikgfigmm
SAN stmwxasmo msfmcr
247 West Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92415-0210
MAR 2 3 2021
By agugfhk MAL.
Deputy
COWNGU'l-hOONA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
LISA HILL, CASE N0. CIVD81826573
Plaintiff,
RULING 0N PLAINTIFF’S
vs. MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES To RE UEST FOR
QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., DOCUMENTS Nos. 4, 68, 69, 75,
Defendants- March
Date: 23, 2021
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Department: S32
WNGCN$QJNAOCO®NGCJ1$03NAO
NNNNNNNMNAAAAAAAAAA
After full consideration of the written and oral submissions by the
parties, the Court rules as follows:
1. The Court DENIES Hill’s Motion to Compel Further Responses as to
Request for Production (RFP) Nos. 64, 68, and 69; but, GRANTS Hill’s
Motion t0 Compel Further Responses as to RFP Nos. 75, 76, and 92. Further
Responses are t0 be provided within 20 days.
Page 1 of 2
2. The Court DENIES Hill’s request for sanctions.
3. The Court DENIES Quaid’s request for sanctions.
Dated: March 23, 2021
(OWVODU'IAOJNA
methflN—‘OOWVGU‘I#WN—\O
NNNNNNMNNAAAAAAAAAA
Page 2 of 2
Document Filed Date
March 23, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 05, 2018
Category
Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT SUchw-j F (g. L- ~E D . COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO 601R}? Sggfirg Fggfikgfigmm SAN stmwxasmo msfmcr 247 West Third Street San Bernardino, California 92415-0210 MAR 2 3 2021 By agugfhk MAL. Deputy COWNGU'l-hOONA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LISA HILL, CASE N0. CIVD81826573 Plaintiff, RULING 0N PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES To RE UEST FOR QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., DOCUMENTS Nos. 4, 68, 69, 75, Defendants- March Date: 23, 2021 Time: 9:00 A.M. Department: S32 WNGCN$QJNAOCO®NGCJ1$03NAO NNNNNNNMNAAAAAAAAAA After full consideration of the written and oral submissions by the parties, the Court rules as follows: 1. The Court DENIES Hill’s Motion to Compel Further Responses as to Request for Production (RFP) Nos. 64, 68, and 69; but, GRANTS Hill’s Motion t0 Compel Further Responses as to RFP Nos. 75, 76, and 92. Further Responses are t0 be provided within 20 days. Page 1 of 2 2. The Court DENIES Hill’s request for sanctions. 3. The Court DENIES Quaid’s request for sanctions. Dated: March 23, 2021 (OWVODU'IAOJNA methflN—‘OOWVGU‘I#WN—\O NNNNNNMNNAAAAAAAAAA Page 2 of 2