On May 25, 2018 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sanchez, Danny,
White Owl Rental, Inc.,
and
Does 1-10, Inclusive,
Krystal Enterprises, Llc,
Lloyd, Terry Stanley,
Sanchez, Rocky H.,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Superxor Court of Cahforma
County of San Bemardino
247 W. Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92415
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
BY
W
Christian
SAN BERNARDINO
JAN 27
Hernandez
A
A1,.IFDRNi/f
GHAE?DW(‘
rrlrs'rmm
2022'
D '7}???
DISTRICT
caseNo. CIVDS\%\'ZQLO
ugwxg Ow\ Magma )
)
Plaintiff, DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
VS
ORDER
’ L\U~(& )
\Qfi V3
Defendants.
3
14
THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior to any party filing a discovery motiou in this action, the moving parfi
16
must schedule and participate in a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and
17
fine Court. The purpose of the conference is to resolve afiy discovery issues without
18
the necessity 0f a noticed motion. At the conference, the issues central to the
19
discovery dispute Will be discussed and the propriety of the referral of the case t0
20
Judicial Reference in accordance with Cal Code (sz'v. Pmc. §§639 and 640, objections
21
to Judicial Reference must be made at this heating, absent extenuating circumstances,
22
and parties must b'e prepared with financial documentation. The time for filing and
23
serving any discovery motion, if necessary, Will be tolled by any delay caused by the
24
court—ordercd telephonic conference. Failure t0 comply with this order may result in
25
court—imposed sanctions.
26
27
Dated:
JAN ‘2
7 M
28 Hon. Khymberli Apaloo
Judge of the Superior Court
1
ORDER
Document Filed Date
January 27, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2018
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Superxor Court of Cahforma County of San Bemardino 247 W. Third Street San Bernardino, California 92415 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, BY W Christian SAN BERNARDINO JAN 27 Hernandez A A1,.IFDRNi/f GHAE?DW(‘ rrlrs'rmm 2022' D '7}??? DISTRICT caseNo. CIVDS\%\'ZQLO ugwxg Ow\ Magma ) ) Plaintiff, DISCOVERY CONFERENCE VS ORDER ’ L\U~(& ) \Qfi V3 Defendants. 3 14 THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior to any party filing a discovery motiou in this action, the moving parfi 16 must schedule and participate in a telephonic discovery conference with all parties and 17 fine Court. The purpose of the conference is to resolve afiy discovery issues without 18 the necessity 0f a noticed motion. At the conference, the issues central to the 19 discovery dispute Will be discussed and the propriety of the referral of the case t0 20 Judicial Reference in accordance with Cal Code (sz'v. Pmc. §§639 and 640, objections 21 to Judicial Reference must be made at this heating, absent extenuating circumstances, 22 and parties must b'e prepared with financial documentation. The time for filing and 23 serving any discovery motion, if necessary, Will be tolled by any delay caused by the 24 court—ordercd telephonic conference. Failure t0 comply with this order may result in 25 court—imposed sanctions. 26 27 Dated: JAN ‘2 7 M 28 Hon. Khymberli Apaloo Judge of the Superior Court 1 ORDER