arrow left
arrow right
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
  • Lilly Williams, et al Plaintiff vs. Baywatch Boat Rentals, Tours & Charters, Inc. Defendant 3 document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 135505141 E-Filed 09/28/2021 05:24:18 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE-21-007626 LILLY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, VS. BAYWATCH BOAT RENTALS, TOURS & CHARTERS,INC., a Florida Corporation, d/b/a CAPTAIN JOE'S BOAT RENTALS, TOURS & CHARTERS,INC., Defendant, ' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, BAYWATCH BOAT RENTALS, TOURS & CHARTERS, INC. ("Baywatch") by and through undersigned counsel, hereby answers the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff and asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Admitted Plaintiffhas asserted a claim for in excess of the Court'sjurisdictional limit; denied Plaintiff is entitled to same. 2. Admitted that the general maritime law is the governing law; balance denied. 3. Admitted for the purposes ofjurisdictionin this case only. 4. Admitted for the purposes ofthis case only. 5. Denied. 6. Denied. 7. Denied. 8 Denied. The applicable standard of care is reasonablecare under the circumstances. *** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 09/28/2021 05:24:17 PM.**** CASE NO.: CACE-21-007626 PAGE 2 9- Denied, including all subparts. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintiff's injuries,if any, were the result of acts of third parties for whom Defendant is not responsible. 2. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintiff was comparatively negligent for any and all injuries and damages asserted in this claim. 3 Defendant affirmatively avers that this action is governed by federal maritime law to the exclusion of state law. 4. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintifffailed to mitigate her damages, and therefore,her damages, if any, should be reduced accordingly. 5. Defendant affirmatively avers that it is entitled to a set-offfor any and all monies paid to or on behalfof Plaintiffas a result of collateral sources. 6. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintiff's damages, if any, were preexisting. Alternatively, if Plaintiff suffered damages, such liability extends only to the aggravation of preexistingdamages. 7. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 8 Defendant affirmatively avers that it are entitled to exonerationand/or limitation of liability pursuantto 46 USC Section 501, et seq. 9- Defendant affirmatively avers that the vessel was seaworthy at all times material. 10. Defendant affirmatively avers that Plaintiff's injuries, if any, were not caused or contributed to by any fault, negligence, or lack of due care by Defendantsor the vessel. HORR,NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. TWO DATRAN CENTER, SU[TIE 1700 - 9130 S. DADELAND BOULEVARD- MIAMI - FLORIDA - 33156 CASE NO.: CACE-21-007626 PAGE 3 11. Defendant affirmatively avers that any damages or injuries to Plaintiff, if any, were done and incurred without the privity and knowledge of Defendants. 12. Defendant affirmatively avers Plaintiff was a trespasser at the time of her alleged incident, and as such, Defendant owed her no duty. 13. Defendant affirmatively avers that because of Plaintiff's conduct, acts and omissions, Plaintiff has waived any claim to damages alleged in the complaint. Defendant reserves the right to amend their affirmative defenses as investigation and discovery continue. WHEREFORE, having answered the Amended Complaint and asserted the foregoing AffirmativeDefenses,Defendant respectfully prays for entry of an Order dismissing the Amended Complaint with prejudice and for such other relief the Court deemsjust and proper. Dated: September 28, 2021 Respectfully submitted, /sl Craig P. Liszt Jonathan W. Skipp Florida Bar No.: 710570 Craig P. Liszt Florida Bar No. 63414 HORR, NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant Baywatch Two Datran Center, Suite 1700 9130 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, FL 33156 Telephone: (305) 670-2525 Facsimile: (305) 670-2526 Attorneys for Defendant HORR,NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. TWO DATRAN CENTER, SU[TIE 1700 - 9130 S. DADELAND BOULEVARD- MIAMI - FLORIDA - 33156 CASE NO.: CACE-21-007626 PAGE 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing has been filed and served this 2* day ofSeptember, 2021, via E-Filing Portal and a true and correct copy provided via E-mail to: Andrew S. Ben, Esq., The Ben Law Firm, PLLC., Attorneys for Plaintiff, 2699 Stirling Road, Suite C-301, Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33312. HORR, NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. Two Datran Center, Suite 1700 9130 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, FL 33156 Telephone: (305) 670-2525 Facsimile: (305) 670-2526 Primary E-mail: /sl Craig P. Liszt Jonathan W. Skipp Florida Bar No.: 710570 Craig P. Liszt Florida Bar No. 63414 HORR, NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant Baywatch Two Datran Center, Suite 1700 9130 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, FL 33156 Telephone: (305) 670-2525 Facsimile: (305) 670-2526 Attorneysfor Defendant HORR,NOVAK & SKIPP, P.A. TWO DATRAN CENTER, SU[TIE 1700 - 9130 S. DADELAND BOULEVARD- MIAMI - FLORIDA - 33156