On July 17, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cazares, Jorge,
and
James A. Shirley Construction, Inc.,
for Wrongful Termination Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
409.mum" 0F CAUFORNIA
v 42+3AM BERNARDING
~11.“ R’NAREUWEO DISTRICT
{4.5:
?EB 08 ZQZZ
a ,
Mm
f
.g m
n.
5
:AEUROSR ?xéfib'i‘s‘fl‘
?wF'ééiia
O\OOOVO\UI#UJN-A
IFORNIA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CAL
TICE
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO—CENTER FOR
JUS
JORGE CAZARES,
Plaintiff, W]
Case No.2 CIVDS 1920981
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT JAMES A. SHIRLEY
CONSTRUCTION, INC.’S MOTION TO
V.
COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY
SHIRLEY PENDING LITIGATION
JAMES A.
CONSTR UCT ION, INC.; and DOES 1 through
tion
[Filed concurrently with Notice ofMo
20, inclusive,
and Motion; Declaration 0f_; Exhibits;
(Proposed) Order; and ProofofService]
Defendants.
Assigned to: Hon. Khymberli S.Apaloo
Date: February 8, 2022
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Department: $25
NNNNNNNNNHr—Iv—du—tu—nw—tp—‘y—n.‘
Complaint Filed: July 17, 2019
WVQMbU’NWObWQQMbWNH
Inc.’s (“JASC” 0r “Defendant”) Motion to Compel
Defendant James A. Shirley Construction,
2022 at 9:00 a.m., in
arly for hearing on February 8,
and Stay Pending Litigation, came regul
court.
Department SZS of the above—entitled
/ / /
/ / /
1
PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOT
ION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
91 8.v1—1/4/22
ClarkHill\6l 849\403 122\265047
.1
After reviewing the papers submitted, hearing the arguments of counsel, and having given full
and fair consideration t0 the issues presented, and for good cause having been shown, this Court
hereby orders as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and t0 Stay Proceedings is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff Jorge Cazares shall arbitrate all of his claims set forth in the operative
\OOONQUIAWNH
Complaint.
3. All further judicial proceedings in this action are stayed pending the completion of
arbitration. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and any settlement or arbitration
award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 664.6 or 1285 et seq., as appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
FEB 08 £022
_
DATED;
\fi
Hon. Khymberli S. Apaloo
NNNNNNNNNb—t—I—A—A—tp—b—IHp—Ir—I
OOQQUI$UJNHO©OONQMhUJNHO
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
ClarkHi11\61849\403122\265047918.vl-1/4/22
Document Filed Date
February 08, 2022
Case Filing Date
July 17, 2019
Category
Wrongful Termination Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
409.mum" 0F CAUFORNIA v 42+3AM BERNARDING ~11.“ R’NAREUWEO DISTRICT {4.5: ?EB 08 ZQZZ a , Mm f .g m n. 5 :AEUROSR ?xéfib'i‘s‘fl‘ ?wF'ééiia O\OOOVO\UI#UJN-A IFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CAL TICE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO—CENTER FOR JUS JORGE CAZARES, Plaintiff, W] Case No.2 CIVDS 1920981 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JAMES A. SHIRLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.’S MOTION TO V. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY SHIRLEY PENDING LITIGATION JAMES A. CONSTR UCT ION, INC.; and DOES 1 through tion [Filed concurrently with Notice ofMo 20, inclusive, and Motion; Declaration 0f_; Exhibits; (Proposed) Order; and ProofofService] Defendants. Assigned to: Hon. Khymberli S.Apaloo Date: February 8, 2022 Time: 9:00 a.m. Department: $25 NNNNNNNNNHr—Iv—du—tu—nw—tp—‘y—n.‘ Complaint Filed: July 17, 2019 WVQMbU’NWObWQQMbWNH Inc.’s (“JASC” 0r “Defendant”) Motion to Compel Defendant James A. Shirley Construction, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., in arly for hearing on February 8, and Stay Pending Litigation, came regul court. Department SZS of the above—entitled / / / / / / 1 PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOT ION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 91 8.v1—1/4/22 ClarkHill\6l 849\403 122\265047 .1 After reviewing the papers submitted, hearing the arguments of counsel, and having given full and fair consideration t0 the issues presented, and for good cause having been shown, this Court hereby orders as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and t0 Stay Proceedings is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff Jorge Cazares shall arbitrate all of his claims set forth in the operative \OOONQUIAWNH Complaint. 3. All further judicial proceedings in this action are stayed pending the completion of arbitration. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and any settlement or arbitration award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 664.6 or 1285 et seq., as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED: FEB 08 £022 _ DATED; \fi Hon. Khymberli S. Apaloo NNNNNNNNNb—t—I—A—A—tp—b—IHp—Ir—I OOQQUI$UJNHO©OONQMhUJNHO 2 PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION ClarkHi11\61849\403122\265047918.vl-1/4/22