Preview
I L
g-
t D r
CALIFORNIA
SUPERQO§FCOURT OE
COUNTY OF SAN BlzRNARDINO
SAN BERNF-thlt" WSTRICT
OCT 01 202%
BY
figm%
J0\.ANNA LEA D
4‘
,Depmv
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT
LLP
0F
10
OFFICES
11
REINHOLTZ
ALEXANDER RUIZ, CASE NO. CIVDSI907976
12
ONLY.LAw
Plaintiff, [Case assigned to Judge Thomas S. Garza —
& Department 827]
13 V.
BARNES
DOCUMENT
14 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL;
WED]
UNDER CODE
JUDGMENT BY COURT
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE §437c
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL
15 CENTER; STEVEN ERNST, M.D.; NABIL
GOETZ, Date: April 20, 2021
MAIN
KOUDUSI, M.D. and DOES 1 through 100, Time: 9:00 a.m.
16 Inclusive, Dept: $27
ERROR! 17
PRINDLE,
Defendants. Complaint Filed: March 12, 2019
Trial Date: March 29, 2021
18
19
20 The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., came on
21 regularly for hearing before this couIT on April 20, 2021, in Department S27, in front 0f the
22 Honorable, Judge Thomas S. Garza, presiding. The Motion for Summary Judgment was unopposed.
23 After full consideration of the evidence, the separate statement of moving pany, expert
24 declaration of Dr. Willis Wagner and the authorities and evidence submitted by counsel for
25 Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., the CouIT found therewas no triable issue ofmaterial fact as t0
26 the cause of action for medical negligence asserted in the pleadings 0f Plaintiff, ALEXANDER
27 RUIZ, NABIL KOUDSI,
W
against Defendant, M.D., and that summary judgment was granted for the
28 following reasons:
1
JUDGMENT
1. The Court finds that Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ's, cause of action for medical
negligence against Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., is without merit;
2. The Court finds that Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., acted within the appropriate
standard of care in the omission of care involving Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ;
3. The Court further finds that Defendant, NOBIL KOUDSI, M.D., did not cause the
alleged injuries or harm claimed by Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant,
NABIL KOUDSI, M.D. and against Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ.
LLP
or
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
OFFICES
11
lo” ZW\\/X
$ch
REINHOLTZ
12
DATED:
I
/2\I ‘
'
~
0NLV.LAw
I
TKOMAS
&
13 Judge 0f the Superior C
BARNES
14
DOCUMENT
15
GOETz,
MAIN
16
ERROR!
17
PRINDLE,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[W0] JUDGMENT
Preview
I L g- t D r CALIFORNIA SUPERQO§FCOURT OE COUNTY OF SAN BlzRNARDINO SAN BERNF-thlt" WSTRICT OCT 01 202% BY figm% J0\.ANNA LEA D 4‘ ,Depmv SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT LLP 0F 10 OFFICES 11 REINHOLTZ ALEXANDER RUIZ, CASE NO. CIVDSI907976 12 ONLY.LAw Plaintiff, [Case assigned to Judge Thomas S. Garza — & Department 827] 13 V. BARNES DOCUMENT 14 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL; WED] UNDER CODE JUDGMENT BY COURT OF CIVIL PROCEDURE §437c LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL 15 CENTER; STEVEN ERNST, M.D.; NABIL GOETZ, Date: April 20, 2021 MAIN KOUDUSI, M.D. and DOES 1 through 100, Time: 9:00 a.m. 16 Inclusive, Dept: $27 ERROR! 17 PRINDLE, Defendants. Complaint Filed: March 12, 2019 Trial Date: March 29, 2021 18 19 20 The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., came on 21 regularly for hearing before this couIT on April 20, 2021, in Department S27, in front 0f the 22 Honorable, Judge Thomas S. Garza, presiding. The Motion for Summary Judgment was unopposed. 23 After full consideration of the evidence, the separate statement of moving pany, expert 24 declaration of Dr. Willis Wagner and the authorities and evidence submitted by counsel for 25 Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., the CouIT found therewas no triable issue ofmaterial fact as t0 26 the cause of action for medical negligence asserted in the pleadings 0f Plaintiff, ALEXANDER 27 RUIZ, NABIL KOUDSI, W against Defendant, M.D., and that summary judgment was granted for the 28 following reasons: 1 JUDGMENT 1. The Court finds that Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ's, cause of action for medical negligence against Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., is without merit; 2. The Court finds that Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D., acted within the appropriate standard of care in the omission of care involving Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ; 3. The Court further finds that Defendant, NOBIL KOUDSI, M.D., did not cause the alleged injuries or harm claimed by Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant, NABIL KOUDSI, M.D. and against Plaintiff, ALEXANDER RUIZ. LLP or 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. OFFICES 11 lo” ZW\\/X $ch REINHOLTZ 12 DATED: I /2\I ‘ ' ~ 0NLV.LAw I TKOMAS & 13 Judge 0f the Superior C BARNES 14 DOCUMENT 15 GOETz, MAIN 16 ERROR! 17 PRINDLE, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [W0] JUDGMENT