We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Citibank Vs Abutin

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Citibank, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Hunt And Henriques, against Mae S Abutin, represented by Unrepresented, in the jurisdiction of Riverside County. This case was filed in Riverside County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Citibank v. Mae S Abutin

Filing Date

December 07, 2010

Category

Collection Crc 3.740-Over $10K/Under $25K

Last Refreshed

December 10, 2021

Practice Area

Creditor

Filing Location

Riverside County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Parties for Citibank v. Mae S Abutin

Plaintiffs

Citibank

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Hunt And Henriques

Defendants

Mae S Abutin

Attorneys for Defendants

Unrepresented

Case Documents for Citibank v. Mae S Abutin

Certificate of Counsel filed.

Date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00

Case Events for Citibank v. Mae S Abutin

Type Description
Docket Event Application for and Renewal of Judgment on Complaint (Collection - Temecula) of CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Docket Event Proof of Service re: Notice of Renewal of Judgment and Application for and Renewal of Judgment on Complaint (Collection - Temecula) of CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Docket Event Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest (MC-012) on Complaint (Collection - Temecula) of CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Hearing Hearing re: Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be issued against Plaintiff for Failure to file Default Judgment pursuant to CRC 3.740 (Temecula).
Hearing Off-Calendar
HEARING RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED AGAINST PLAINTIFF FOR FAILURE TO FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CRC 3.740 (TEMECULA).
Off-Calendar
Docket Event Legacy Minute Order: Hearing re: Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be issued against Plaintiff for Failure to file Default Judgment pursuant to CRC 3.740 (Temecula).
WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED; RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Not Applicable
ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED
Not Applicable
Docket Event Judgment by Default by Clerk filed 02/25/11
JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT BY CLERK FILED 02/25/11
Not Applicable
See all events