Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON
A 23-Cv Other Pi/Pd/Wd - Civil Unlimited case was filed by (Subcribe to view) against (Subscribe to view) represented by (Subscribe to view) in the jurisdiction of Kern County. Judge Chapin, Sidney P. presiding.
Case Details
Case Number
Filing Date
April 13, 2010
Last Refreshed
November 20, 2021
Filing Location
Kern County, CA
Category
23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited
Practice Area
Torts
Matter Type
General Torts
Status
Dismissal
Case Duration
1 year, 8 months and 21 days
OTHER JUDGES ON THIS CASE
Parties
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Attorneys for Defendants
Case Events
Date | Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
January 03, 2012 | hearing |
Judgment IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS. **CHAPIN** |
|
January 03, 2012 | Docket Event |
Judgment IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS. **CHAPIN** |
|
October 13, 2010 | hearing |
Case Management Conference
Judge: Chapin, Sidney P. |
|
September 17, 2010 | hearing | Notice of Entry | |
September 09, 2010 | hearing |
Order Dismissing Action (Full) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/19/2010 in Department 4, before the Honorable Sidney P Chapin, pursuant to a Motion to Declare Plaintiff, John W. Williams, a Vexatious Litigant. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled motion was granted. Plaintiff was ordered to post security of $7500 for the case to proceed. As of this date, 9/08/2010, no security has been posted. Case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ Sidney P Chapin Judge of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/19/2010 in Department 4, before the Honorable Sidney P Chapin, pursuant to a Motion to Declare Plaintiff, John W. Williams, a Vexatious Litigant. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled motion was granted. Plaintiff was ordered to post security of $7500 for the case to proceed. As of this date, 9/08/2010, no security has been posted. Case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ Sidney P Chapin Judge of the Superior Court |
|
September 09, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order Dismissing Action (Full) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/19/2010 in Department 4, before the Honorable Sidney P Chapin, pursuant to a Motion to Declare Plaintiff, John W. Williams, a Vexatious Litigant. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled motion was granted. Plaintiff was ordered to post security of $7500 for the case to proceed. As of this date, 9/08/2010, no security has been posted. Case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ Sidney P Chapin Judge of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/19/2010 in Department 4, before the Honorable Sidney P Chapin, pursuant to a Motion to Declare Plaintiff, John W. Williams, a Vexatious Litigant. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled motion was granted. Plaintiff was ordered to post security of $7500 for the case to proceed. As of this date, 9/08/2010, no security has been posted. Case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ Sidney P Chapin Judge of the Superior Court |
|
September 07, 2010 | hearing |
Order DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT, REQUIRING SECURITY AND IMPOSING A PREFILING ORDER **JUDGE SIDNEY P. CHAPIN** |
|
September 07, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT, REQUIRING SECURITY AND IMPOSING A PREFILING ORDER **JUDGE SIDNEY P. CHAPIN** |
|
August 31, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause Calendar Notes: RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110 CONT. FROM 7-27-10 RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110 CONT. FROM 7-27-10 Judge: Chapin, Sidney P. |
|
August 31, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause Calendar Notes: RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110 CONT. FROM 7-27-10 RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110 CONT. FROM 7-27-10 Judge: Chapin, Sidney P. |
|
August 30, 2010 | hearing |
Mail Returned Undelivered COPY OF PREFILING ORDER FOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT MAILED TO JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS AT KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON PO BOX 6000, DELANO, CA 93216. 9/22/2010 REMAILED TO JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS TO CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SALINAS VALLEY PO BOX 1050, SOLEDAD, CA 93960 |
|
August 30, 2010 | Docket Event |
Mail Returned Undelivered COPY OF PREFILING ORDER FOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT MAILED TO JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS AT KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON PO BOX 6000, DELANO, CA 93216. 9/22/2010 REMAILED TO JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS TO CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SALINAS VALLEY PO BOX 1050, SOLEDAD, CA 93960 |
|
August 26, 2010 | hearing |
Notice of Change Name/Address AS TO PLAINTIFF, JOHN W. WILLIAMS. NEW ADDRESS: CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SALINAS VALLEY PO BOX 1050, SOLEDAD, CA 93960 FILED BY JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
August 26, 2010 | hearing |
Hearing Vacated VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ~ calid=1321769 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4003, CourtDate:08/31/2010, Courtroom:4, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:7, SessionType:OSC, Judge:SPC, Deputy:KENNIE, SystemDate:7/29/2010 10:49:24 AM |
|
August 26, 2010 | hearing |
Hearing Vacated VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ~ calid=1244948 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4148, CourtDate:10/13/2010, Courtroom:4, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:2, SessionType:CCM, Judge:SPC, Deputy:eileeni, SystemDate:4/23/2010 8:10:35 AM |
|
August 26, 2010 | Docket Event |
Hearing Vacated VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ~ calid=1244948 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4148, CourtDate:10/13/2010, Courtroom:4, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:2, SessionType:CCM, Judge:SPC, Deputy:eileeni, SystemDate:4/23/2010 8:10:35 AM |
|
August 26, 2010 | Docket Event |
Notice of Change Name/Address AS TO PLAINTIFF, JOHN W. WILLIAMS. NEW ADDRESS: CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SALINAS VALLEY PO BOX 1050, SOLEDAD, CA 93960 FILED BY JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
August 26, 2010 | Docket Event |
Hearing Vacated VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ~ calid=1321769 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4003, CourtDate:08/31/2010, Courtroom:4, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:7, SessionType:OSC, Judge:SPC, Deputy:KENNIE, SystemDate:7/29/2010 10:49:24 AM |
|
August 25, 2010 | hearing |
Joinder IN Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant |
|
August 25, 2010 | hearing |
Prefiling Order Vexatious Litigant AS TO JOHNS WESLEY WILLIAMS V-34099 **JUDGE MICHAEL B\. LEWIS, PRESIDIING JUDGE** |
|
August 25, 2010 | hearing |
Order RE: POSTING OF SECURITY DEPOSIT BY VEXATIOUS LITIGANT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 391.3 $7,500.00 TO BE POSTED **JUDGE SIDNEY P. CHAPIN** |
|
August 25, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order RE: POSTING OF SECURITY DEPOSIT BY VEXATIOUS LITIGANT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 391.3 $7,500.00 TO BE POSTED **JUDGE SIDNEY P. CHAPIN** |
|
August 25, 2010 | Docket Event |
Joinder IN Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant |
|
August 25, 2010 | Docket Event |
Prefiling Order Vexatious Litigant AS TO JOHNS WESLEY WILLIAMS V-34099 **JUDGE MICHAEL B\. LEWIS, PRESIDIING JUDGE** |
|
August 19, 2010 | hearing |
Response AND OBJECTIONS TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DECLARATION OF JOHN W. WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT THEREOF FILED BY JOHN WESLEY WILLIAM, IN PRO PER |
|
August 19, 2010 | hearing |
NP1490 Department: 4 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant -DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF K HARRINGTON (DE-1) APPEARS BY MISHA D IGRA ESQ. M BITER (DE-2) APPEARS BY MISHA D IGRA ESQ. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANTS- J. CASTRO AND T. BILLINGS *************************************************************************************** MATTER ARGUED BY COUNSEL AND SUBMITTED. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: JOHN W WILLIAMS V-34099 (PL-1) MOTION FOR CONTINUE IS DENIED. MOTION FOR TO DECLAR PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT IS GRANTED. MOTION GRANTED ON BASIS OF CASES LISTED 1-14, 18 AND 19. Request for Judicial Notice IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY IN AMOUNT OF $7500 FOR THE CASE TO PROCEED. MATTER STAYED. MISHA D IGRA TO PREPARE ORDER AFTER HEARING. THE CLERK TO PREPARE DECLARATION RE: VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
|
August 19, 2010 | hearing |
4002 Motion Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: 07/19/10 DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
|
August 19, 2010 | hearing |
Motion Tentative Ruling: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE IS DENIED. MOTION GRANTED ON BASIS OF CASES LISTED 1-14, 18 AND 19. Request for Judicial Notice IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY IN AMOUNT OF $7500 FOR THE CASE TO PROCEED. MATTER STAYED. 07/19/10 DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT Judge: Chapin, Sidney P. |
|
August 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Response AND OBJECTIONS TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DECLARATION OF JOHN W. WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT THEREOF FILED BY JOHN WESLEY WILLIAM, IN PRO PER |
|
August 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP1490 Department: 4 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant -DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF K HARRINGTON (DE-1) APPEARS BY MISHA D IGRA ESQ. M BITER (DE-2) APPEARS BY MISHA D IGRA ESQ. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANTS- J. CASTRO AND T. BILLINGS *************************************************************************************** MATTER ARGUED BY COUNSEL AND SUBMITTED. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: JOHN W WILLIAMS V-34099 (PL-1) MOTION FOR CONTINUE IS DENIED. MOTION FOR TO DECLAR PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT IS GRANTED. MOTION GRANTED ON BASIS OF CASES LISTED 1-14, 18 AND 19. Request for Judicial Notice IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY IN AMOUNT OF $7500 FOR THE CASE TO PROCEED. MATTER STAYED. MISHA D IGRA TO PREPARE ORDER AFTER HEARING. THE CLERK TO PREPARE DECLARATION RE: VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
|
August 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Motion Tentative Ruling: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE IS DENIED. MOTION GRANTED ON BASIS OF CASES LISTED 1-14, 18 AND 19. Request for Judicial Notice IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO POST SECURITY IN AMOUNT OF $7500 FOR THE CASE TO PROCEED. MATTER STAYED. 07/19/10 DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT Judge: Chapin, Sidney P. |
|
August 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
4002 Motion Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: 07/19/10 DEFENDANTS HARRINGTON AND BITER TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
|
August 18, 2010 | hearing | Notice of Related Case(s) | |
August 18, 2010 | hearing |
Facsimile Transmission Cover Sheet RE: COURT CALL SCHEDULED FOR 8/19/2010 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 4 DIRECTED TO PRISON LITIGATION COORDINATOR, WILLIAM ADAMS, FOR APPEARANCE OF PLAINTIFF, JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
August 18, 2010 | Docket Event |
Facsimile Transmission Cover Sheet RE: COURT CALL SCHEDULED FOR 8/19/2010 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 4 DIRECTED TO PRISON LITIGATION COORDINATOR, WILLIAM ADAMS, FOR APPEARANCE OF PLAINTIFF, JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
August 11, 2010 | hearing |
Reply to Opposition REPLIED TO: Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant HEARING DATE: 08/19/10 TIME: 8:30 AM DEPT/DIV:4 |
|
August 11, 2010 | Docket Event |
Reply to Opposition REPLIED TO: Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant HEARING DATE: 08/19/10 TIME: 8:30 AM DEPT/DIV:4 |
|
July 29, 2010 | hearing |
Request (MOTION AND) TO VACATE AUGUST 19, 2010 HEARING TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BASED ON IMPROPER SERVICE; DECLARATION OF JOHN W WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT THEREOF FILED BY JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
July 29, 2010 | Docket Event |
Request (MOTION AND) TO VACATE AUGUST 19, 2010 HEARING TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BASED ON IMPROPER SERVICE; DECLARATION OF JOHN W WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT THEREOF FILED BY JOHN W. WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
July 27, 2010 | hearing |
NP1511 Department: 7 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF JOHN W. WILLIAMS. *************************************************************************************** THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CONTINUED TO 08/31/2010 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 4. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO ATTACHED DECLARATION OF MAILING. |
|
July 27, 2010 | hearing |
4159 Order to Show Cause - (N20a - CRC 3.110) Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: TRANSFERRED TO DEPT 7; DEPT 4 IS DARK |
|
July 27, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 TRANSFERRED TO DEPT 7; DEPT 4 IS DARK Judge: Lampe, David R. |
|
July 27, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 TRANSFERRED TO DEPT 7; DEPT 4 IS DARK Judge: Lampe, David R. |
|
July 27, 2010 | Docket Event |
NP1511 Department: 7 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RE COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.C. RULE 3.110. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF JOHN W. WILLIAMS. *************************************************************************************** THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CONTINUED TO 08/31/2010 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 4. COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO ATTACHED DECLARATION OF MAILING. |
|
July 27, 2010 | Docket Event |
4159 Order to Show Cause - (N20a - CRC 3.110) Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: TRANSFERRED TO DEPT 7; DEPT 4 IS DARK |
|
July 19, 2010 | hearing |
Request for Judicial Notice MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
July 19, 2010 | hearing |
Points and Authorities [MEMORANDUM OF] IN SUPPORT OF Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
July 19, 2010 | hearing |
Notice of Motion RE: TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER HEARING DATE: 08/19/10 HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM HEARING DEPT/DIV: 4 ATTORNEY(S): MISHA D. IGRA |
|
July 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Notice of Motion RE: TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER HEARING DATE: 08/19/10 HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM HEARING DEPT/DIV: 4 ATTORNEY(S): MISHA D. IGRA |
|
July 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Points and Authorities [MEMORANDUM OF] IN SUPPORT OF Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
July 19, 2010 | Docket Event |
Request for Judicial Notice MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
July 16, 2010 | hearing |
Declaration OF MISHA D. IGRA IN SUPPORT OF Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
July 16, 2010 | Docket Event |
Declaration OF MISHA D. IGRA IN SUPPORT OF Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant; REQUIRING SECURITY; AND ISSUANCE OF A PREFILING ORDER MISHA D. IGRA, ESQ. 08/19/10 8:30 AM DEPT 4 |
|
June 11, 2010 | hearing |
Request for Judicial Notice AND INTERVENTION REGARDING PROCESS OF SERVICE OF Summons AND COMPLAINT FILED BY JON WESLEY WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
June 11, 2010 | Docket Event |
Request for Judicial Notice AND INTERVENTION REGARDING PROCESS OF SERVICE OF Summons AND COMPLAINT FILED BY JON WESLEY WILLIAMS, IN PRO PER |
|
May 27, 2010 | hearing |
Rejection/Correction Notice TO: JOHN W WILLIAMS V 34099 PO BOX 6000 DELANO CA 93216 . RE: WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS XX The attached COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED AND INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF papers are being returned for the following reason(s): YOU MUST SEND TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DIRECTLY; COURT DOES NOT FORWARD DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: JOHN W WILLIAMS V 34099 PO BOX 6000 DELANO CA 93216 . RE: WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS XX The attached COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED AND INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF papers are being returned for the following reason(s): YOU MUST SEND TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DIRECTLY; COURT DOES NOT FORWARD DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. |
|
May 27, 2010 | Docket Event |
Rejection/Correction Notice TO: JOHN W WILLIAMS V 34099 PO BOX 6000 DELANO CA 93216 . RE: WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS XX The attached COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED AND INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF papers are being returned for the following reason(s): YOU MUST SEND TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DIRECTLY; COURT DOES NOT FORWARD DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: JOHN W WILLIAMS V 34099 PO BOX 6000 DELANO CA 93216 . RE: WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS XX The attached COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO BE SERVED AND INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF papers are being returned for the following reason(s): YOU MUST SEND TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DIRECTLY; COURT DOES NOT FORWARD DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:WILLIAMS V-34099 VS HARRINGTON Case No. S-1500-CV-270209, SPC __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to Complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file Application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. |
|
April 23, 2010 | hearing |
Notice / Assign / Status / JES NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE, THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE IS ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin FOR ALL PURPOSES. IT WILL BE MANAGED ON THE DIRECT CALENDAR PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT 4 UNTIL ITS CONCLUSION. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, IF ANY, MUST BE MADE WITHIN THE TIMES SET OUT IN CCP SECTION 170.6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE INITIALS "SPC" AFTER THE CASE NUMBER ON ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS FILED IN THIS CASE. TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, BY THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin ON Oct 13, 2010 AT 8:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 4 OF THIS COURT. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS ARE TO BE FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. ALL PARTIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), ADR Information Packet,Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE, THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE IS ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin FOR ALL PURPOSES. IT WILL BE MANAGED ON THE DIRECT CALENDAR PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT 4 UNTIL ITS CONCLUSION. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, IF ANY, MUST BE MADE WITHIN THE TIMES SET OUT IN CCP SECTION 170.6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE INITIALS "SPC" AFTER THE CASE NUMBER ON ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS FILED IN THIS CASE. TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, BY THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin ON Oct 13, 2010 AT 8:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 4 OF THIS COURT. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS ARE TO BE FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. ALL PARTIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), ADR Information Packet,Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. |
|
April 23, 2010 | hearing |
Order to Show Cause NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jul 27, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_4 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jul 27, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_4 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. |
|
April 23, 2010 | hearing |
CONV New case created by deputy: 33 |
|
April 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
CONV New case created by deputy: 33 |
|
April 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
Notice / Assign / Status / JES NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE, THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE IS ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin FOR ALL PURPOSES. IT WILL BE MANAGED ON THE DIRECT CALENDAR PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT 4 UNTIL ITS CONCLUSION. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, IF ANY, MUST BE MADE WITHIN THE TIMES SET OUT IN CCP SECTION 170.6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE INITIALS "SPC" AFTER THE CASE NUMBER ON ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS FILED IN THIS CASE. TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, BY THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin ON Oct 13, 2010 AT 8:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 4 OF THIS COURT. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS ARE TO BE FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. ALL PARTIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), ADR Information Packet,Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE, THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE IS ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin FOR ALL PURPOSES. IT WILL BE MANAGED ON THE DIRECT CALENDAR PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT 4 UNTIL ITS CONCLUSION. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, IF ANY, MUST BE MADE WITHIN THE TIMES SET OUT IN CCP SECTION 170.6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE INITIALS "SPC" AFTER THE CASE NUMBER ON ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS FILED IN THIS CASE. TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY IN THIS ACTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, BY THE HONORABLE Sidney P Chapin ON Oct 13, 2010 AT 8:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 4 OF THIS COURT. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS ARE TO BE FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. ALL PARTIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CRC Rule 3.720 - 3.730. APPEARANCE BY THE ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRIAL OF THIS ACTION IS MANDATORY. NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date with the service of the Summons, Complaint (Local Rule 3.8 (a)), ADR Information Packet,Civil Mediation Information Brochure, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form. [CRC, Rule 3.221] NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT'S COUNSEL IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants. |
|
April 23, 2010 | Docket Event |
Order to Show Cause NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jul 27, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_4 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jul 27, 2010 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_4 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. |
|
April 13, 2010 | hearing | Initial Order on Court Fee Waiver - Granted | |
April 13, 2010 | hearing |
Request to Waive Court Fees IN PRO PER |
|
April 13, 2010 | hearing | Summons Issued and Filed | |
April 13, 2010 | hearing |
Complaint - Fast Track IN PRO PER |
|
April 13, 2010 | Docket Event |
Complaint - Fast Track IN PRO PER |
|
April 13, 2010 | Docket Event |
Request to Waive Court Fees IN PRO PER |