1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Star: Hills Vs Ets Services, Llc
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Star: Hills Vs Ets Services, Llc

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Star: Hills, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case against Ets Services, Llc, Gmac Mortgage, Hoecker, Charles R, Solorzano, Trustee, Omar, represented by Duncan, John D, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Palmer, William D. presiding.

Case Details for Star: Hills v. Ets Services, Llc , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Palmer, William D.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

182 days

Filing Date

November 10, 2008

Category

37-Cv Other Contract-Civil Unlimited

Time To Trial

308 days

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

135 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Case Cycle Time

316 days

Parties for Star: Hills v. Ets Services, Llc , et al.

Plaintiffs

Star: Hills

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Ets Services, Llc

Gmac Mortgage

Hoecker, Charles R

Solorzano, Trustee, Omar

Attorneys for Defendants

Duncan, John D

Case Events for Star: Hills v. Ets Services, Llc , et al.

Date Type Description
September 22, 2009 Hearing Rejection/Correction Notice
MOTION TO DISMISS AND CHECK RETURNED CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED SENT VIA MAIL
September 22, 2009 Docket Event Rejection/Correction Notice
MOTION TO DISMISS AND CHECK RETURNED CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED SENT VIA MAIL
September 18, 2009 Hearing Order Dismissing Action (Full)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Good cause appearing therefore, on the Defendant's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO APPEAR AT TRIAL (CCP SECTION 581(b) (5))..
September 18, 2009 Docket Event Order Dismissing Action (Full)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Good cause appearing therefore, on the Defendant's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO APPEAR AT TRIAL (CCP SECTION 581(b) (5))..
September 14, 2009 Hearing NP1711
Department: 15
September 14, 2009 Hearing NP1835
Department: 15 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: AMENDED MINUTE ORDER. DUE TO COURT'S REQUEST THIS MINUTE ORDER AMENDED ON 9/15/2009 BY JENIFER GARDNER TO CORRECT OMISSION OF INFORMATION AS INDICATED ON THE RECORD. COURT TRIAL/CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR TRIAL BY COURT WITH COUNSEL AND PARTIES PRESENT IN OPEN COURT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF. DOUGLAS TOLENO APPEARS ON BEHALF OF ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS. *************************************************************************************** NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF AT TIME OF TRIAL. THE COURT INQUIRES OF COUNSEL AS TO ANY BANKRUPTCY FILING. COUNSEL REPORTS HE HAS NO INFORMATION OF A BANKRUPTCY FILING. NO STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ON FILE. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILING TO APPEAR AT TRIAL. (CCP SECTION 581(b)(5)). COPY OF MINUTE ORDER MAILED TO PARTIES AS STATED ON DECLARATION OF MAILING.
September 14, 2009 Hearing 4147 Court Trial/Final Case Management Conference
New Calendar
September 14, 2009 Hearing Court Trial

Judge: Palmer, William D.
September 14, 2009 Docket Event 4147 Court Trial/Final Case Management Conference
New Calendar
September 14, 2009 Docket Event NP1711
Department: 15
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.