1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Krueger Vs Tovar
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Krueger Vs Tovar

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Amy Krueger Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman Krueger, Brandy Susan Campbell Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman K, filed a(n) Automobile - Torts case represented by Landsgaard, Olaf A, against Tovar, Kaoru, Tucker, Tony, represented by Davis, Monte R, Jr., in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Wallace, Arthur E presiding.

Case Details for Amy Krueger Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman Krueger v. Tovar, Kaoru , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Wallace, Arthur E

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

181 days

Filing Date

December 05, 2006

Category

22-Cv Auto - Civil Unlimited

Time To Trial

419 days

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2021

Practice Area

Torts

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

199 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Automobile

Case Cycle Time

420 days

Parties for Amy Krueger Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman Krueger v. Tovar, Kaoru , et al.

Plaintiffs

Amy Krueger Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman Krueger

Brandy Susan Campbell Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman K

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Landsgaard, Olaf A

Defendants

Tovar, Kaoru

Tucker, Tony

Attorneys for Defendants

Davis, Monte R, Jr.

Case Events for Amy Krueger Individually And On Behalf Of The Estate Of David Norman Krueger v. Tovar, Kaoru , et al.

Date Type Description
January 29, 2008 Hearing 4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal
New Calendar
January 29, 2008 Docket Event 4170 Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal
New Calendar
January 28, 2008 Hearing 4000 Jury Trial
New Calendar
January 28, 2008 Docket Event 4000 Jury Trial
New Calendar
January 18, 2008 Hearing 4142 Final Case Management Conference
New Calendar
January 18, 2008 Docket Event 4142 Final Case Management Conference
New Calendar
January 16, 2008 Hearing Request for Dismissal (Entire)
WITH PREJUDICE, ENTIRE ACTION. DULY FILED AND ENTERED. FILED BY OLAF ARTHUR LANDSGAARD, ESQ
January 16, 2008 Docket Event Request for Dismissal (Entire)
WITH PREJUDICE, ENTIRE ACTION. DULY FILED AND ENTERED. FILED BY OLAF ARTHUR LANDSGAARD, ESQ
January 11, 2008 Hearing Rejection/Correction Notice
TO: OLAF ARTHUR LANDSGAARD XX The attached REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION is being returned for the following reason(s): XX Mark only one box in area 1 (a) - with or without prejudice. Both boxes were marked?
January 11, 2008 Docket Event Rejection/Correction Notice
TO: OLAF ARTHUR LANDSGAARD XX The attached REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION is being returned for the following reason(s): XX Mark only one box in area 1 (a) - with or without prejudice. Both boxes were marked?
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.