1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Kapoor Vs Sampson
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Kapoor Vs Sampson

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Kapoor, Julie, Kapoor, Nigel, Kapoor, Sanjay, filed a(n) General Small Claims - Small Claims case against Sampson, Tanner, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Etienne, Linda S. presiding.

Case Details for Kapoor, Julie v. Sampson, Tanner , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Etienne, Linda S.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

March 13, 2013

Category

Small Claims - 1,501 To 5,000

Last Refreshed

November 19, 2021

Practice Area

Small Claims

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

General Small Claims

Case Cycle Time

96 days

Parties for Kapoor, Julie v. Sampson, Tanner , et al.

Plaintiffs

Kapoor, Julie

Kapoor, Nigel

Kapoor, Sanjay

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Sampson, Tanner

Case Events for Kapoor, Julie v. Sampson, Tanner , et al.

Date Type Description
June 17, 2013 Hearing Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
JUDGMENT ENTERED 5/29/13
June 17, 2013 Docket Event Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
JUDGMENT ENTERED 5/29/13
May 29, 2013 Hearing NP1821
Department: 12 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: RULING ON: TRIAL BY COURT HEREBY SUBMITTED ON 05/21/2013 DISPOSED AFTER COURT TRIAL, AFTER EVIDENCE BY BOTH SIDES (STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY). THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE EVIDENCE SHOWED THAT PLAINTIFF SANJAY KAPOOR ATTEMPTED TO CROSS QUAIL CREEK ROAD WITH HIS TWO DOGS. IT WAS DARK AT THE TIME, AND HE UNDERTOOK TO CROSS THE ROAD MID-BLOCK AND OUTSIDE OF ANY MARKED CROSSWALK. PLAINTIFF HAD REACHED THE CENTER SHARED TURN LANE WHEN HE SAW THE DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE APPROACHING. HE LET GO OF THE DOGS, WHO REMAINED IN THE ROAD, AND RETREATED TO THE CURB ON THE WEST SIDE OF QUAIL CREEK ROAD. THE DOGS WERE IN THE ROADWAY WHEN THEY WERE STRUCK. THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE THAT STRUCK PLAINTIFF'S DOGS, TANNER SAMPSON, WAS A MINOR AT THE TIME. SAMPSON HAD TURNED ONTO QUAIL CREEK ROAD AND WAS PROCEEDING SOUTHBOUND ON QUAIL CREEK ROAD. HE DID NOT SEE PLAINTIFF OR HIS DOGS BEFORE STRIKING THEM. BOTH KAPOOR AND SAMPSON WERE NEGLIGENT. KAPOOR ATTEMPTED TO CROSS THE ROADWAY OUTSIDE OF A MARKED CROSSWALK OR AT AN INTERSECTION IN THE DARK AT A TIME WHEN IT WAS NOT SAFE TO DO SO. (SEE VEH. CODE 21954). SAMPSON WAS NEGLIGENT IN FAILING TO OPERATE HIS VEHICLE IN SUCH A MANNER WOULD PERMIT HIM TO BE ABLE TO SAFELY STOP OR AVOID COLLIDING WITH PERSONS OR OBJECTS WITHIN THE ROADWAY. (SEE VEH. CODE 22350). KAPOOR AND SAMPSON WERE EQUALLY NEGLIGENT. JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR PRINCIPAL $669.00 PLUS COURT COSTS IN THE SUM OF $50.00. SMALL CLAIMS CLERK TO ATTACH RULING TO NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.
May 29, 2013 Docket Event NP1821
Department: 12 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: RULING ON: TRIAL BY COURT HEREBY SUBMITTED ON 05/21/2013 DISPOSED AFTER COURT TRIAL, AFTER EVIDENCE BY BOTH SIDES (STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY). THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE EVIDENCE SHOWED THAT PLAINTIFF SANJAY KAPOOR ATTEMPTED TO CROSS QUAIL CREEK ROAD WITH HIS TWO DOGS. IT WAS DARK AT THE TIME, AND HE UNDERTOOK TO CROSS THE ROAD MID-BLOCK AND OUTSIDE OF ANY MARKED CROSSWALK. PLAINTIFF HAD REACHED THE CENTER SHARED TURN LANE WHEN HE SAW THE DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE APPROACHING. HE LET GO OF THE DOGS, WHO REMAINED IN THE ROAD, AND RETREATED TO THE CURB ON THE WEST SIDE OF QUAIL CREEK ROAD. THE DOGS WERE IN THE ROADWAY WHEN THEY WERE STRUCK. THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE THAT STRUCK PLAINTIFF'S DOGS, TANNER SAMPSON, WAS A MINOR AT THE TIME. SAMPSON HAD TURNED ONTO QUAIL CREEK ROAD AND WAS PROCEEDING SOUTHBOUND ON QUAIL CREEK ROAD. HE DID NOT SEE PLAINTIFF OR HIS DOGS BEFORE STRIKING THEM. BOTH KAPOOR AND SAMPSON WERE NEGLIGENT. KAPOOR ATTEMPTED TO CROSS THE ROADWAY OUTSIDE OF A MARKED CROSSWALK OR AT AN INTERSECTION IN THE DARK AT A TIME WHEN IT WAS NOT SAFE TO DO SO. (SEE VEH. CODE 21954). SAMPSON WAS NEGLIGENT IN FAILING TO OPERATE HIS VEHICLE IN SUCH A MANNER WOULD PERMIT HIM TO BE ABLE TO SAFELY STOP OR AVOID COLLIDING WITH PERSONS OR OBJECTS WITHIN THE ROADWAY. (SEE VEH. CODE 22350). KAPOOR AND SAMPSON WERE EQUALLY NEGLIGENT. JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR PRINCIPAL $669.00 PLUS COURT COSTS IN THE SUM OF $50.00. SMALL CLAIMS CLERK TO ATTACH RULING TO NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.
May 21, 2013 Hearing Exhibit(s) List
Document Image
May 21, 2013 Hearing NP1500
Department: 12 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: TRIAL BY COURT. HEARING BEFORE TRIAL. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: SANJAY KAPOOR (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. JULIE KAPOOR (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. TANNER SAMPSON (DE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. ALSO PRESENT: KIM PETERSON, DEFENDANT'S MOTHER. *************************************************************************************** THE COURT IS INFORMED DEFENDANT IS A MINOR. THE COURT APPOINTS KIM PETERSON AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR DEFENDANT; TANNER SAMPSON. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: KIM PETERSON EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY DEFENSE. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: CAUSE STANDS SUBMITTED. EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
May 21, 2013 Hearing 4150 Small Claims Trial
Hearing Entered.
May 21, 2013 Hearing Small Claims Trial

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
May 21, 2013 Docket Event Exhibit(s) List
Document Image
May 21, 2013 Docket Event NP1500
Department: 12 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: TRIAL BY COURT. HEARING BEFORE TRIAL. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: SANJAY KAPOOR (PL-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. JULIE KAPOOR (PL-2) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. TANNER SAMPSON (DE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. ALSO PRESENT: KIM PETERSON, DEFENDANT'S MOTHER. *************************************************************************************** THE COURT IS INFORMED DEFENDANT IS A MINOR. THE COURT APPOINTS KIM PETERSON AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR DEFENDANT; TANNER SAMPSON. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: KIM PETERSON EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY DEFENSE. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: CAUSE STANDS SUBMITTED. EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.