1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Frontier Real Estate Vs Dearman
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Frontier Real Estate Vs Dearman

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Frontier Real Estate Services, Inc, filed a(n) Unlawful Detainer - Property case represented by Young, Robert Morris, against Dearman, Margo Maria, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Etienne, Linda S. presiding.

Case Details for Frontier Real Estate Services, Inc v. Dearman, Margo Maria

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Etienne, Linda S.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

October 22, 2014

Category

32-Cl <10K Unlawful Detainer - Residential - Civil Limited

Last Refreshed

November 18, 2021

Practice Area

Property

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

14 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Unlawful Detainer

Case Cycle Time

105 days

Parties for Frontier Real Estate Services, Inc v. Dearman, Margo Maria

Plaintiffs

Frontier Real Estate Services, Inc

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Young, Robert Morris

Defendants

Dearman, Margo Maria

Case Events for Frontier Real Estate Services, Inc v. Dearman, Margo Maria

Date Type Description
February 04, 2015 Hearing Order to Show Cause

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
January 14, 2015 Hearing Final Judgment/Unlawful Detainer
**SIGNED BY COMMISSIONER ETIENNE**
January 14, 2015 Docket Event Final Judgment/Unlawful Detainer
**SIGNED BY COMMISSIONER ETIENNE**
January 08, 2015 Hearing Writ of Possession Returned Wholly Satisfied
Document Image
January 08, 2015 Docket Event Writ of Possession Returned Wholly Satisfied
Document Image
December 29, 2014 Hearing Declaration for Default
JUDGMENT BY COURT
December 29, 2014 Hearing Request for Entry of Default and Court Judgment
AS TO MARGO MARIA DEARMAN
December 29, 2014 Docket Event Request for Entry of Default and Court Judgment
AS TO MARGO MARIA DEARMAN
December 29, 2014 Docket Event Declaration for Default
JUDGMENT BY COURT
December 19, 2014 Hearing Rejection/Correction Notice
TO: ROBERT M YOUNG RETURNED VIA SUPERIOR PROCESS RE: FRONTIER REAL ESTATE VS DEARMA Case No. S-1500-CL-288198, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X The attached 11/24/14 COURT JUDGMENT PACKET_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s): X Other: DATE IN ITEM 12 b IS PRIOR TO THE DATE IN 12 a AND PRIOR TO FILING OF COMPLAINT. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: ROBERT M YOUNG RETURNED VIA SUPERIOR PROCESS RE: FRONTIER REAL ESTATE VS DEARMA Case No. S-1500-CL-288198, LSE NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X The attached 11/24/14 COURT JUDGMENT PACKET_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s): X Other: DATE IN ITEM 12 b IS PRIOR TO THE DATE IN 12 a AND PRIOR TO FILING OF COMPLAINT. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.