1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Turner Vs Bakersfield Mazda
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Turner Vs Bakersfield Mazda

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Turner, Hazel Mae, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case against Bakersfield Mazda, represented by Kharazi, Hadi-Ty S, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Etienne, Linda S. presiding.

Case Details for Turner, Hazel Mae v. Bakersfield Mazda

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Etienne, Linda S.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

185 days

Filing Date

February 21, 2014

Category

06-Cl >10K <25K Breach Of Contract/Warranty-Civil Limited

Last Refreshed

November 19, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

105 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Case Cycle Time

595 days

Parties for Turner, Hazel Mae v. Bakersfield Mazda

Plaintiffs

Turner, Hazel Mae

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Bakersfield Mazda

Attorneys for Defendants

Kharazi, Hadi-Ty S

Case Events for Turner, Hazel Mae v. Bakersfield Mazda

Date Type Description
October 09, 2015 Hearing Proof of Service
Motion to reopen court case.
October 09, 2015 Docket Event Proof of Service
Motion to reopen court case.
August 26, 2014 Hearing Order Dismissing Action (Full)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/5/2014, in Department 12, before the Honorable LINDA S ETIENNE, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ LINDA S ETIENNE Commissioner of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/5/2014, in Department 12, before the Honorable LINDA S ETIENNE, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ LINDA S ETIENNE Commissioner of the Superior Court
August 26, 2014 Docket Event Order Dismissing Action (Full)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/5/2014, in Department 12, before the Honorable LINDA S ETIENNE, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ LINDA S ETIENNE Commissioner of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 8/5/2014, in Department 12, before the Honorable LINDA S ETIENNE, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ LINDA S ETIENNE Commissioner of the Superior Court
August 25, 2014 Hearing Case Management Conference

Judge: Etienne, Linda S.
August 19, 2014 Hearing Hearing Vacated
CASE DISMISSED ~ calid=2484248 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4153, CourtDate:08/25/2014, Courtroom:12, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:0, SessionType:CCM, Judge:LSE, SystemDate:2/21/2014 10:50:51 AM
August 19, 2014 Docket Event Hearing Vacated
CASE DISMISSED ~ calid=2484248 Vacating calendar hearing. EventCode:4153, CourtDate:08/25/2014, Courtroom:12, SessionNumber:1, Sequence:0, SessionType:CCM, Judge:LSE, SystemDate:2/21/2014 10:50:51 AM
August 06, 2014 Hearing Memorandum of Costs
TOTAL COSTS $576.00
August 06, 2014 Docket Event Memorandum of Costs
TOTAL COSTS $576.00
August 05, 2014 Hearing NP1511
Department: 12 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CRC 3.110 THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF APPEARANCE TELEPHONICALLY BY COURTCALL BY HADI-TY S KHARAZI ON BEHALF OF BAKERSFIELD MAZDA (DE-1). *************************************************************************************** THE COURT FINDS AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WAS NEVER FILED WITH THE COURT. CASE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ON THE COURTS OWN MOTION
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.