1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Lazaruk Vs Sherwood
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Lazaruk Vs Sherwood

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Lazaruk, Corey, filed a(n) Unlawful Detainer - Property case against Sherwood, Zachary, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Schuett, Stephen D. presiding.

Case Details for Lazaruk, Corey v. Sherwood, Zachary

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Schuett, Stephen D.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

October 21, 2011

Category

32-Cl <10K Unlawful Detainer - Residential - Civil Limited

Last Refreshed

November 19, 2021

Practice Area

Property

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

56 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Unlawful Detainer

Case Cycle Time

209 days

Parties for Lazaruk, Corey v. Sherwood, Zachary

Plaintiffs

Lazaruk, Corey

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Sherwood, Zachary

Case Events for Lazaruk, Corey v. Sherwood, Zachary

Date Type Description
May 17, 2012 Hearing Rejection/Correction Notice
TO: COREY LAZARUK PLTF PRO PER 4900 CALIFORNAI AVE STE B210 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 RE: LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X__ The attached REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT PACKET ON U.D. CASE_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s):AN ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WAS FILED ON 3/1/12/CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DOCUMENTS RETURNED BACK VIA "A COMPLETE EVICTON SERVICE" __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: COREY LAZARUK PLTF PRO PER 4900 CALIFORNAI AVE STE B210 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 RE: LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X__ The attached REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT PACKET ON U.D. CASE_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s):AN ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WAS FILED ON 3/1/12/CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DOCUMENTS RETURNED BACK VIA "A COMPLETE EVICTON SERVICE" __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.
May 17, 2012 Docket Event Rejection/Correction Notice
TO: COREY LAZARUK PLTF PRO PER 4900 CALIFORNAI AVE STE B210 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 RE: LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X__ The attached REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT PACKET ON U.D. CASE_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s):AN ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WAS FILED ON 3/1/12/CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DOCUMENTS RETURNED BACK VIA "A COMPLETE EVICTON SERVICE" __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: COREY LAZARUK PLTF PRO PER 4900 CALIFORNAI AVE STE B210 BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 RE: LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X__ The attached REQUEST FOR COURT JUDGMENT PACKET ON U.D. CASE_ papers are being returned for the following reason(s):AN ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WAS FILED ON 3/1/12/CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DOCUMENTS RETURNED BACK VIA "A COMPLETE EVICTON SERVICE" __ Your pleadings have been filed; however, this matter will not be calendared for the following reason(s): __ Fee of $___________ required for _____________________. Additional fee of $___________ required. __ Filing fee of $_________________ returned. Check No. ____________________. __ Civil Case Cover Sheet required. __ Signature missing: __ Not an original. Copies not acceptable. __ Acknowledgement of Receipt must be attached to a completed Proof of Service. __ Superior Court case number / Judge's initials: __wrong __missing. __ Does not conform to Rule 2.100 - 2.119 / 3.250 / California Rules of Court. __ Attach proof of Service on opposing party. __ Correct Proof of Service as follows:_____________________________________________________. __ Default cannot be entered. Reason:_____________________________________________________. __ This pleading does not appear to be for Superior Court, Kern County. __ Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. Page: 1 of 2 NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS (continued) RE:LAZARUK VS SHERWOOD Case No. S-1500-CL-263592, CJW __ Not submitted timely under provisions of CCP Section 1005 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300. __ Date you have noticed is a court holiday. __ Hearing must be renoticed for another date: Judge is unavailable from ____________________ to ____________________. Matter will be calendared at time of filing renotice with the court. NO FEE. __ Must be renoticed for ________________ a.m. in Department/Division ____________. __ Answer to complaint must accompany stipulation to set aside default. __ To dismiss entire action, need joinder of ____________________________________________________. __ Dismissal cannot be entered. Reason: ______________________________________________________. __ Need to submit dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Kern County Local Rule 336(e). __ Consolidated matter: any case numbers to which the dismissal applies must be listed in the body of the document under "other". __ Answer filed: you will be notified of trial date. __ Must file application for Writ of Possession. __ Does not conform to Kern County Local Rule __________________________________. __ Consolidated matter: all case numbers must be listed in the heading with the lead case. __ Does not conform to California Rules of Court, Rule ____________________________. __ Must use Mandatory Judicial Council form. __ Order page does not contain enough information regarding case; need at least three lines of text with identifying information for order and case (short case title and case number). __ Item(s) # _________________________________ incomplete. __ Other: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.
March 07, 2012 Hearing Mail Returned Undelivered
RETURNED FROM COREY LAZARUK - ENCLOSED: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION - DATED 3/1/2012
March 07, 2012 Docket Event Mail Returned Undelivered
RETURNED FROM COREY LAZARUK - ENCLOSED: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION - DATED 3/1/2012
March 01, 2012 Hearing Order to Show Cause
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 1/19/12, in Department 17, before the Honorable CORY J WOODWARD, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ CORY J WOODWARD Judge of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 1/19/12, in Department 17, before the Honorable CORY J WOODWARD, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ CORY J WOODWARD Judge of the Superior Court
March 01, 2012 Docket Event Order to Show Cause
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 1/19/12, in Department 17, before the Honorable CORY J WOODWARD, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ CORY J WOODWARD Judge of the Superior Court Calendar Notes: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION The above-entitled cause came on regularly on 1/19/12, in Department 17, before the Honorable CORY J WOODWARD, pursuant to an Order to Appear for failure to comply with local rules made under the provision of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act of 1986. Good cause appearing therefore, on the Court's own motion, it is by the Court Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above-entitled cause be, and the same is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: ________________________ ____________________________________ CORY J WOODWARD Judge of the Superior Court
January 19, 2012 Hearing NP1511
Department: 17 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CRC 3.17.1. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF. NO APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT. *************************************************************************************** THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: CASE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
January 19, 2012 Hearing 4191 Order to Show Cause (Local Rule 3.15.1(c))
Hearing Entered. Calendar Notes: COMPLAINT FILED 10/21/2011
January 19, 2012 Hearing Order to Show Cause - Local Rule 3.15.1(c)
COMPLAINT FILED 10/21/2011

Judge: Woodward, Cory J.
January 19, 2012 Docket Event Order to Show Cause - Local Rule 3.15.1(c)
COMPLAINT FILED 10/21/2011

Judge: Woodward, Cory J.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.