We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Ortiz Vs Gonzalez

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Arturo Ortiz, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Pro Per, against Salvador Arana Gonzalez, represented by Unrepresented, in the jurisdiction of Riverside County. This case was filed in Riverside County Superior Courts with John D. Molloy presiding.

Case Details for Arturo Ortiz v. Salvador Arana Gonzalez

Filing Date

December 31, 2008

Category

Breach Of Contract-Over $10K/Under $25K (Ri)&Nbsp;

Last Refreshed

October 23, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

621 days

Filing Location

Riverside County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Parties for Arturo Ortiz v. Salvador Arana Gonzalez

Plaintiffs

Arturo Ortiz

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Pro Per

Defendants

Salvador Arana Gonzalez

Attorneys for Defendants

Unrepresented

Case Documents for Arturo Ortiz v. Salvador Arana Gonzalez

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FILED.

Date: 2008-12-31T00:00:00

Case Events for Arturo Ortiz v. Salvador Arana Gonzalez

Type Description
Hearing DATE TO SET OSC RE DESTRUCTION OF FILE (JUDGMENT)
Hearing DATE TO SET OSC RE DESTRUCTION OF FILE (JUDGMENT)
Hearing HEARING RE: MOTION TO/FOR AWARDING REAL PROPERTY TO PLAINTIFF TO SATISFY JUDGMENT BY ARTURO ORTIZ
Denied
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OF MTN FOR AWARDING REAL PROPERTY ON SALVADOR ARANA GONZALEZ WITH A MAILING DATE OF 07/11/11 FILED. (NON-COMPLAINT)
Not Applicable
Docket Event MOTION TO/FOR AWARDING REAL PROPERTY TO PLAINTIFF TO SATISFY JUDGMENT BY ARTURO ORTIZ FILED
Docket Event HEARING SET 8/01/11 AT 9:00 IN DEPARTMENT 02
Hearing ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING WHY DISMISSAL ON COMPLAINT FILED 12/31/2008 OF ARTURO ORTIZ SHOULD NOT BE ORDERED UNLESS JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL IS ENTERED PRIOR TO 04/07/11.
Vacated
Docket Event JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT BY COURT FILED 02/09/11
Not Applicable
Docket Event DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR DAMAGES INTEREST AND COSTS CCP 585; 1169 FILED
Not Applicable
Hearing ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING WHY DISMISSAL ON COMPLAINT FILED 12/31/2008 OF ARTURO ORTIZ SHOULD NOT BE ORDERED UNLESS JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL IS ENTERED PRIOR TO 06/30/10.
OSC SET
See all events