We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Capital One Bank Vs Shin

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Capital One Bank, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Patenaude & Felix, against Kang Shin, represented by Unrepresented, in the jurisdiction of Riverside County. This case was filed in Riverside County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Capital One Bank v. Kang Shin

Filing Date

December 05, 2008

Category

Collection Crc 3.740-Under $10,000 (Riverside)&Nbsp;

Last Refreshed

October 23, 2021

Practice Area

Creditor

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

235 days

Filing Location

Riverside County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Case Cycle Time

3980 days

Parties for Capital One Bank v. Kang Shin

Plaintiffs

Capital One Bank

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Patenaude & Felix

Defendants

Kang Shin

Attorneys for Defendants

Unrepresented

Case Documents for Capital One Bank v. Kang Shin

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FILED.

Date: 2008-12-05T00:00:00

Case Events for Capital One Bank v. Kang Shin

Type Description
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OF NOTICE OF RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT/APPLIC OF RENEWAL ON KANG SHIN WITH A MAILING DATE OF 09/30/19 FILED. (NON-COMPLAINT)
Not Applicable
Docket Event RETURNED DOCUMENT: APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWNAL OF JUDGMENT SUBMITTED BY CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NA.
Not Applicable
Hearing DATE TO SET OSC RE DESTRUCTION OF FILE (JUDGMENT)
Docket Event NOTICE OF RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT ISSUED AND FILED.
Not Applicable
Docket Event NOTE: PROOF OF SERVICE REQUIRED BEFORE ISSUANCE OFWRIT/ABSTRACT (ISSUE 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE)
Not Applicable
Docket Event APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT FILED. TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT AMOUNT $1,781.27. ORIGINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED ON 07/28/09.
Not Applicable
Docket Event MEMORANDUM OF CREDITS OF $0.00.
Not Applicable
Docket Event --AND ACCRUED INTEREST OF $0.00 AND COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF $0.00 FILED.
Not Applicable
Docket Event PAPER RECORDS DESTROYED/DIGITALLY ARCHIVED. PAPER DOCUMENTS/FILE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/RECORDS MANAGEMENT A.10.400.1, PAPER RECORDS RETENTION AND DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
Not Applicable
Hearing HEARING RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED AGAINST PLAINTIFF FOR FAILURE TO FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CRC 3.740.
Vacated
See all events