1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Riverside County Superior Courts
  5. People Vs Thelma J Sadler
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

People Vs Thelma J Sadler

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Thelma J Sadler, filed a(n) Petition For Dismissal Pursuant To Pc 1203.4/1203.4A case against District Attorney, in the jurisdiction of Riverside County. This case was filed in Riverside County Superior Courts with Jeffrey Prevost presiding.

Case Details for Thelma J Sadler v. District Attorney

Case Number

(Subscribe to View) Track Case Changes

Judge

Jeffrey Prevost Track Judge’s New Cases

Filing Date

April 09, 2014

Category

Petition For Dismissal Pursuant To Pc 1203.4/1203.4A

Last Refreshed

December 16, 2021

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

27 days

Filing Location

Riverside County, CA

Case Cycle Time

43 days

Parties for Thelma J Sadler v. District Attorney

Plaintiffs

Thelma J Sadler

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

District Attorney

Other Parties

In Pro Per (Attorney)

Office Of The District Attorney -Riverside (Attorney)

Pro Per (Attorney)

Rim440183 (Case Number Criminal)

Rim440183 (Case Number-criminal Case)

Unrepresented (Attorney)

Case Documents for Thelma J Sadler v. District Attorney

Order for Dismissal is Granted; Honorable Judge Jeffrey J Prevost (PC 1203.4/1203.4a).

Date: May 06, 2014

Petition for Dismissal pursuant to PC 1203.4/1203.4a filed.

Date: 2014-04-09T00:00:00

Legacy Minute Order: Hearing re: Petition/Motion for Dismissal PC 1203.4/1203.4a (Non Appearance).

Date: May 06, 2014

Proof of Service by MAIL on the Crim Petn for Dismissal PC1203.4/1203.4a of SADLER served on DISTRICT ATTORNEY filed; Date of mailing 04/07/14

Date: 2014-04-09T00:00:00

RAP SHEET Lodged by Court.

Date: 2014-04-09T00:00:00

Case Events for Thelma J Sadler v. District Attorney

Date Type Description
May 06, 2020 Hearing Hearing re: Petition/Motion for Dismissal PC 1203.4/1203.4a (Non Appearance).
Complete
May 22, 2014 MANUAL SUBSEQUENT 8715 COMPLETED.
Not Applicable
May 22, 2014 MANUAL 8715 SENT TO DOJ.
Not Applicable
May 22, 2014 JUS8715A LODGED BY COURT.
Not Applicable
May 06, 2014 HEARING RE: PETITION/MOTION FOR DISMISSAL PC 1203.4/1203.4A (NON APPEARANCE).
Completed
May 06, 2014 Docket Event Order for Dismissal is Granted; Honorable Judge Jeffrey J Prevost (PC 1203.4/1203.4a).
May 06, 2014 Docket Event Legacy Minute Order: Hearing re: Petition/Motion for Dismissal PC 1203.4/1203.4a (Non Appearance).
May 06, 2014 HEARING RE: PETITION/MOTION FOR DISMISSAL PC 1203.4/1203.4A (NON APPEARANCE) SET 5/06/14 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 32.
May 06, 2014 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL IS GRANTED HONORABLE JUDGE JEFFREY J. PREVOST (PC 1203.4/1203.4A).
Not Applicable
May 05, 2014 CCRPDC HEARING SET FOR 04/28/14 AT 08:30 IS VACATED -FOR THE REASON: 15 DAYS HAS EXPIRED W/NO RESPONSE FROM DAS OFFICE
Not Applicable
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.