We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Richard Mulcahy -V- Fred Rosas, Etal

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Richard Mulcahy, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Silverman, Phillip E, against Fred Rosas, represented by Unrepresented, in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. This case was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Courts with Ben T. Kayashima presiding.

Case Details for Richard Mulcahy v. Fred Rosas

Judge

Ben T. Kayashima

Filing Date

December 22, 1999

Category

Other Civil Contracts

Last Refreshed

October 14, 2022

Practice Area

Commercial

Filing Location

San Bernardino County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Parties for Richard Mulcahy v. Fred Rosas

Plaintiffs

Richard Mulcahy

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Silverman, Phillip E

Defendants

Fred Rosas

Attorneys for Defendants

Unrepresented

Case Events for Richard Mulcahy v. Fred Rosas

Type Description
Docket Event NOTICE OF STAY FILED IN RE: BANKRUPTCY PETITION OF FRED ROSAS; BANKRUPTCY CASE NUMBER IS RS01-22852 MG.
Not Applicable
Docket Event ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED
Not Applicable
Docket Event NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FILED BY RICHARD MULCAHY.
Not Applicable
Docket Event OSC RE: DISMISSAL
VACATED
Docket Event CLERKS JUDGMENT ENTERED
Not Applicable
Docket Event MEMO OF P&AS W/FILE SENT TO DEPT R12 FOR REVIEW
Not Applicable
Docket Event POINTS & AUTHORITIES FILED BY RICHARD MULCAHY.
Not Applicable
Docket Event DEFAULT PACKET RECEIVED
Not Applicable
Docket Event OSC RE: DISMISSAL - Minutes
Continued
BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING CLERK: LUANN GEESINK BAILIFF: C DAZALLA REPORTER: ROCIO GONZALEZ - APPEARANCES: SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY LAVONNA HAYASHI FOR PLTFS ATTORNEY PHILLIP E SILVERMAN. - HEARINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL SET FOR 11:00 AT R12 IN DEPARTMENT PLAINTIFF TO RESUBMIT JUDGMENT PACKET. NOTICE WAIVED. === MINUTE ORDER END ===

Judge: BEN T KAYASHIMA PRESIDING

Docket Event JUDGMENT IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): PER JUDGE, MUST GIVE US LEGAL BASIS FOR INTEREST .
Not Applicable
See all events