Contents

Details Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Merati V Ng

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

filed a(n) General Family - Family case in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Purcell, Catherine presiding.

Case Details for Merati V Ng

Judge

Purcell, Catherine

Filing Date

October 06, 2006

Category

Family Law - Miscellaneous

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2022

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

General Family

Case Cycle Time

20 days

Case Events for Merati V Ng

Type Description
Hearing NP1040
Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PETITIONER'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED 10/06/06. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: AMBER HOVING SEE EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ITEMS MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION OR ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. THE EXIBIT PROVIDED BY PLAINTIFF OF A TAPE RECORDING THE COURT TRANSCRIBES THE RECORDING AND RETURN AND RETURNS THE TAPE AND TAPE RECORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF BY NO OBJECTIONS OF THE PARTIES. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE COURT GRANTS THE CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS AS REQUESTED. PER CCP 527 ET SEQ, THE COURT WILL ISSUE A RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE DEFENDANT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING AN OCCURRENCE OF CIVIL HARASSMENT. THE RESTRAINING ORDER WILL BE GRANTED FOR TWO YEARS. BASED UPON THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE, IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT THERE HAS BEEN REASONABLE PROOF OF A COURSE OF CONDUCT OF HARASSMENT AS DEFINED IN CCP 527.6. COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF TO BE A CREDIBLE WITNESS. THE COURT FINDS THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE ORDERS TO PROTECT THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS TO PREPARE AND PROVIDE THE PARTIES WITH AN ORDER AND SUBMIT THE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE CLERK PREPARES THE ORDER, THE COURT SIGNS THE ORDER, THE PARTIES ARE PROVIDED A COPY IN OPEN COURT. THE ORDER IS SUBMITTED FOR ENTRY INTO CLETS. DEFENDANT TESTIFIES THAT DEFENDANT DOES NOT OWN OR POSSESS ANY FIREARMS. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
Hearing Restraining Order After Hearing - CLETS
RESTRAINING ORDERS EXPIRE: 10/26/08 FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT
Hearing Miscellaneous Filing
VERIFICATION OF FIREARMS
Hearing 4072 OSC/Petition re: Harassment
New Calendar
Hearing Order to Show Cause

Judge: Purcell, Catherine

Docket Event Restraining Order After Hearing - CLETS
RESTRAINING ORDERS EXPIRE: 10/26/08 FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT
Docket Event NP1040
Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PETITIONER'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED 10/06/06. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: AMBER HOVING SEE EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ITEMS MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION OR ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. THE EXIBIT PROVIDED BY PLAINTIFF OF A TAPE RECORDING THE COURT TRANSCRIBES THE RECORDING AND RETURN AND RETURNS THE TAPE AND TAPE RECORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF BY NO OBJECTIONS OF THE PARTIES. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE COURT GRANTS THE CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS AS REQUESTED. PER CCP 527 ET SEQ, THE COURT WILL ISSUE A RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE DEFENDANT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING AN OCCURRENCE OF CIVIL HARASSMENT. THE RESTRAINING ORDER WILL BE GRANTED FOR TWO YEARS. BASED UPON THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE, IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT THERE HAS BEEN REASONABLE PROOF OF A COURSE OF CONDUCT OF HARASSMENT AS DEFINED IN CCP 527.6. COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF TO BE A CREDIBLE WITNESS. THE COURT FINDS THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE ORDERS TO PROTECT THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS TO PREPARE AND PROVIDE THE PARTIES WITH AN ORDER AND SUBMIT THE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE CLERK PREPARES THE ORDER, THE COURT SIGNS THE ORDER, THE PARTIES ARE PROVIDED A COPY IN OPEN COURT. THE ORDER IS SUBMITTED FOR ENTRY INTO CLETS. DEFENDANT TESTIFIES THAT DEFENDANT DOES NOT OWN OR POSSESS ANY FIREARMS. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
Docket Event Miscellaneous Filing
VERIFICATION OF FIREARMS
Docket Event 4072 OSC/Petition re: Harassment
New Calendar
Hearing NP1505
Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PLAINTIFF'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. THE COURT REQUESTS THE CASE TO BE CONTINUED TO 10/26/06 TO HAVE ADEQUATE TIME TO HEAR THE MATTER. PARTIES STIPULATE AND THEREFORE THE COURT ORDERS: THE CASE TO BE CONTINUED TO 10/26/06 @ 9:00 AM. TIME SET FOR HEARING: 10/26/06 @ 9:00 AM FOR PLANTIFF'S OSC/TRO RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED ON 10/26/06. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
See all events