Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago
filed a(n) General Family - Family case in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Purcell, Catherine presiding.
Case Number |
|
Filing DateOctober 06, 2006 |
CategoryFamily Law - Miscellaneous |
Last RefreshedNovember 20, 2022 |
Practice AreaFamily |
Filing LocationKern County, CA |
Matter TypeGeneral Family |
Case Cycle Time20 days |
Date | Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
October 26, 2006 | Hearing |
NP1040 Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PETITIONER'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED 10/06/06. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: AMBER HOVING SEE EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ITEMS MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION OR ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. THE EXIBIT PROVIDED BY PLAINTIFF OF A TAPE RECORDING THE COURT TRANSCRIBES THE RECORDING AND RETURN AND RETURNS THE TAPE AND TAPE RECORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF BY NO OBJECTIONS OF THE PARTIES. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE COURT GRANTS THE CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS AS REQUESTED. PER CCP 527 ET SEQ, THE COURT WILL ISSUE A RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE DEFENDANT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING AN OCCURRENCE OF CIVIL HARASSMENT. THE RESTRAINING ORDER WILL BE GRANTED FOR TWO YEARS. BASED UPON THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE, IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT THERE HAS BEEN REASONABLE PROOF OF A COURSE OF CONDUCT OF HARASSMENT AS DEFINED IN CCP 527.6. COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF TO BE A CREDIBLE WITNESS. THE COURT FINDS THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE ORDERS TO PROTECT THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS TO PREPARE AND PROVIDE THE PARTIES WITH AN ORDER AND SUBMIT THE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE CLERK PREPARES THE ORDER, THE COURT SIGNS THE ORDER, THE PARTIES ARE PROVIDED A COPY IN OPEN COURT. THE ORDER IS SUBMITTED FOR ENTRY INTO CLETS. DEFENDANT TESTIFIES THAT DEFENDANT DOES NOT OWN OR POSSESS ANY FIREARMS. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT. |
|
October 26, 2006 | Hearing |
Restraining Order After Hearing - CLETS RESTRAINING ORDERS EXPIRE: 10/26/08 FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT |
|
October 26, 2006 | Hearing |
Miscellaneous Filing VERIFICATION OF FIREARMS |
|
October 26, 2006 | Hearing |
4072 OSC/Petition re: Harassment New Calendar |
|
October 26, 2006 | Hearing |
Order to Show Cause
Judge: Purcell, Catherine |
|
October 26, 2006 | Docket Event |
Restraining Order After Hearing - CLETS RESTRAINING ORDERS EXPIRE: 10/26/08 FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT |
|
October 26, 2006 | Docket Event |
NP1040 Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PETITIONER'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED 10/06/06. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. PLAINTIFF IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. DEFENDANT IS DULY SWORN AND TESTIFIES. THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES ARE DULY SWORN AND TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: AMBER HOVING SEE EXHIBIT LIST ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ITEMS MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION OR ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. THE EXIBIT PROVIDED BY PLAINTIFF OF A TAPE RECORDING THE COURT TRANSCRIBES THE RECORDING AND RETURN AND RETURNS THE TAPE AND TAPE RECORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF BY NO OBJECTIONS OF THE PARTIES. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE COURT GRANTS THE CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS AS REQUESTED. PER CCP 527 ET SEQ, THE COURT WILL ISSUE A RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE DEFENDANT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING AN OCCURRENCE OF CIVIL HARASSMENT. THE RESTRAINING ORDER WILL BE GRANTED FOR TWO YEARS. BASED UPON THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE, IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT THERE HAS BEEN REASONABLE PROOF OF A COURSE OF CONDUCT OF HARASSMENT AS DEFINED IN CCP 527.6. COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF TO BE A CREDIBLE WITNESS. THE COURT FINDS THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE ORDERS TO PROTECT THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS TO PREPARE AND PROVIDE THE PARTIES WITH AN ORDER AND SUBMIT THE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE CLERK PREPARES THE ORDER, THE COURT SIGNS THE ORDER, THE PARTIES ARE PROVIDED A COPY IN OPEN COURT. THE ORDER IS SUBMITTED FOR ENTRY INTO CLETS. DEFENDANT TESTIFIES THAT DEFENDANT DOES NOT OWN OR POSSESS ANY FIREARMS. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT. |
|
October 26, 2006 | Docket Event |
Miscellaneous Filing VERIFICATION OF FIREARMS |
|
October 26, 2006 | Docket Event |
4072 OSC/Petition re: Harassment New Calendar |
|
October 25, 2006 | Hearing |
NP1505 Department: BR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: PLAINTIFF'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: CATHERINE MERATI (PE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. MICHAEL NG (RE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. THE COURT REQUESTS THE CASE TO BE CONTINUED TO 10/26/06 TO HAVE ADEQUATE TIME TO HEAR THE MATTER. PARTIES STIPULATE AND THEREFORE THE COURT ORDERS: THE CASE TO BE CONTINUED TO 10/26/06 @ 9:00 AM. TIME SET FOR HEARING: 10/26/06 @ 9:00 AM FOR PLANTIFF'S OSC/TRO RE: CIVIL HARASSMENT FILED ON 10/26/06. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT. |
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.