1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Capital One Bank (Usa) V Bonilla
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Capital One Bank (Usa) V Bonilla

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Capital One Bank, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Afra, Karen K, against Bonilla, Ruth, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Kenneth G. Pritchard presiding.

Case Details for Capital One Bank v. Bonilla, Ruth

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Kenneth G. Pritchard

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

374 days

Filing Date

June 30, 2009

Category

09-Cl >10K <25K Other Collections-Civil Limited

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2021

Practice Area

Creditor

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

416 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Case Cycle Time

416 days

Parties for Capital One Bank v. Bonilla, Ruth

Plaintiffs

Capital One Bank

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Afra, Karen K

Defendants

Bonilla, Ruth

Case Events for Capital One Bank v. Bonilla, Ruth

Date Type Description
August 20, 2010 Hearing NP1435
Department: AR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. NO APPEARANCE BY EITHER PARTY. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE PLAINTIFF HAVING BEEN SERVED WITH NOTICE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE DISMISSED IF CAUSE WAS NOT SHOWN WHY PLAINTIFF FAILED TO PROSECUTE THE MATTER AND/OR FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, THE COURT ORDERS THE CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
August 20, 2010 Hearing 4145 Further Case Management Conference
Hearing Entered.
August 20, 2010 Hearing Further Case Management Conference

Judge: Pritchard, Kenneth G.
August 20, 2010 Docket Event 4145 Further Case Management Conference
Hearing Entered.
August 20, 2010 Docket Event NP1435
Department: AR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. NO APPEARANCE BY EITHER PARTY. THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND ORDERS: THE PLAINTIFF HAVING BEEN SERVED WITH NOTICE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE DISMISSED IF CAUSE WAS NOT SHOWN WHY PLAINTIFF FAILED TO PROSECUTE THE MATTER AND/OR FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, THE COURT ORDERS THE CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
July 19, 2010 Hearing Notice of Order to Appear
NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR FAILUE TO SUBMIT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON AUGUST 20,2010 AT 10:00AM IN DEPARTMENT AR OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY UNLESS 4 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AN ANSWER, OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONVERTING THE ACTION TO AN ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, A STIPULATED JUDGMENT OR STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR A NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS TRAILED WITH THIS OSC. THE PLAINTIFF MAY APPEAR BY COURT CALL FOR THE HERAING. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR FAILUE TO SUBMIT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON AUGUST 20,2010 AT 10:00AM IN DEPARTMENT AR OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY UNLESS 4 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AN ANSWER, OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONVERTING THE ACTION TO AN ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, A STIPULATED JUDGMENT OR STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR A NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS TRAILED WITH THIS OSC. THE PLAINTIFF MAY APPEAR BY COURT CALL FOR THE HERAING.
July 19, 2010 Docket Event Notice of Order to Appear
NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR FAILUE TO SUBMIT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON AUGUST 20,2010 AT 10:00AM IN DEPARTMENT AR OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY UNLESS 4 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AN ANSWER, OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONVERTING THE ACTION TO AN ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, A STIPULATED JUDGMENT OR STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR A NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS TRAILED WITH THIS OSC. THE PLAINTIFF MAY APPEAR BY COURT CALL FOR THE HERAING. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR FAILUE TO SUBMIT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON AUGUST 20,2010 AT 10:00AM IN DEPARTMENT AR OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY UNLESS 4 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AN ANSWER, OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONVERTING THE ACTION TO AN ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, A STIPULATED JUDGMENT OR STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR A NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS TRAILED WITH THIS OSC. THE PLAINTIFF MAY APPEAR BY COURT CALL FOR THE HERAING.
July 09, 2010 Hearing NP1430
Department: AR Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: NO APPEARANCE BY EITHER PARTY THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: THE COURT ORDERS THE CLERK TO ISSUE PLAINTIFF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, IF ANY, WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, FTP AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY UNLESS 4 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AN ANSWER, OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONVERTING THE ACTION TO AN ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, A STIPULATED JUDGMENT OR STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR A NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. IF THERE IS A FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SCHEDULED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, THE COURT INTENDS TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS TO BE TRAILED WITH THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. THE CLERK IS TO INCLUDE A PROVISION ON THE NOTICE THAT THE PLAINTIFF MAY APPEAR BY PHONE. CAUSE CONTINUED TO 08/20/2010 AT 10:00 AM FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE COURT ORDERS ADJOURNMENT.
July 09, 2010 Hearing 4153 Case Management Conference
Hearing Entered.
July 09, 2010 Hearing Case Management Conference

Judge: Pritchard, Kenneth G.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.