We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Affinito Vs. Affinito

Case Last Refreshed: 5 months ago

Affinito, Mary, Affinito, Michelle, filed a(n) Civil case represented by Davis, Josh P, against Affinito, Michael, Hendrickson, Roger, Rurik Trust Company, represented by Vaught, Jon R, in the jurisdiction of Contra Costa County. This case was filed in Contra Costa County Superior Courts Superior.

Case Details for Affinito, Mary v. Affinito, Michael , et al.

Filing Date

February 17, 2017

Category

Civil

Last Refreshed

November 27, 2023

Filing Location

Contra Costa County, CA

Filing Court House

Superior

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Parties for Affinito, Mary v. Affinito, Michael , et al.

Plaintiffs

Affinito, Mary

Affinito, Michelle

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Davis, Josh P

Defendants

Affinito, Michael

Hendrickson, Roger

Rurik Trust Company

Attorneys for Defendants

Vaught, Jon R

Case Events for Affinito, Mary v. Affinito, Michael , et al.

Type Description
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO *HEARING ON MOTION IN RE: MOTION TO TAX COSTS FILED BY PLN ON 9/20/23 FILED BY: AFFINITO, MARY *TENTATIVE RULING:* The Court grants the motion to tax costs...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO *HEARING ON MOTION IN RE: NOTICE OF INTENTION OF PLAINTIFFS TO MOVE TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT FILED BY PLN ON 7/20/23 FILED BY: AFFINITO, MARY *TENTATIVE RULI...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO RE DOE NO. 4 FILED BY PLAINTIFFS *TENTATIVE RULING:* Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration is granted in part. Th...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO SUBSTITUTE MICHAEL JAMES GUITARD, MANAGING AGENT OF DEFENDANT RURIK, AS DOE NO. 4 *TENTATIVE RULING:* This motion ...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO JURY TRIAL *TENTATIVE RULING:* Parties to appear and be ready for jury trial. A failure to appear may result in the imposition of sanctions.
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING ON MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE MICHAEL JAMES GUITARD AS DOE 4 FILED BY PLAINTIFFS *TENTATIVE RULING:* Plaintiffs’ motion to substitute Michael Guitard int...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING IN RE: HEARING FOR DEFAULTED DEFENDANTS *TENTATIVE RULING:* Parties to appear and be ready for hearing. Failure to appear may result in imposition ...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING IN RE: MANDATORY JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERNENCE *TENTATIVE RULING:* Appearance required.
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING ON MOTION TO CONFORM PLEADINGS TO PROOF FILED BY MARY AFFINITO, MICHELLE AFFINITO * TENTATIVE RULING: * The “Motion to Conform Pleadings To Proof,”...
Tentative Ruling MSC17-00286 CASE NAME: AFFINITO VS. AFFINITO HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR AN ORDER SETTING A SEPARATE TRIAL FILED BY MICHAEL AFFINITO * TENTATIVE RULING: * This motion is continued to March 14, 2022 to be...
See all events