We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Bridge Property Management Company Vs. Shimelis Tadesse Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 6 months ago

Bridge Property Management Company, filed a(n) Unlawful Detainer - Property case represented by Rothbard, Todd Bennett, against Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102, Tadesse, Shimelis 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102, in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Bridge Property Management Company v. Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102 , et al.

Filing Date

April 15, 2019

Category

Unlawful Detainer - Residential

Last Refreshed

November 22, 2023

Practice Area

Property

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

46 days

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

Unlawful Detainer

Case Cycle Time

101 days

Case Complaint Summary

This complaint is a proof of service of summons document in a legal case. The plaintiff, Bridge Property Management Company, is serving the defendant, Shimelis Tadesse, with various documents including the summons, complaint, Alternative Dispute Reso...

Parties for Bridge Property Management Company v. Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102 , et al.

Plaintiffs

Bridge Property Management Company

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Rothbard, Todd Bennett

Defendants

Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102

Tadesse, Shimelis 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102

Case Documents for Bridge Property Management Company v. Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102 , et al.

NOTICE TO DEFENDANTS

Date: April 15, 2019

Case Events for Bridge Property Management Company v. Does I Through V, Inclusive 333 Fell Street, Unit #104 San Francisco, Ca 94102 , et al.

Type Description
Docket Event RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY ISSUED TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, SATISFIED AS TO REAL PROPERTY ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
Docket Event EXECUTION FOR POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY ISSUED TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
Docket Event DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT DOES I THROUGH V, INCLUSIVE
Docket Event REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT/DEFAULT ENTERED, CLERK'S JUDGMENT REQUESTED, DECLARATION OF NON-MILITARY STATUS AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
Docket Event DECLARATION OF DAILY RENTAL VALUE [$36.93 PER DAY] FILED BY PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Docket Event UNDER APPLICATION TO THE CLERK FOR JUDGMENT UNDER SEC 1169 C.C.P., IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY RECOVER FROM DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS THE RESTITUTION AND POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES: 333 FELL STREET, UNIT #104, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT
Docket Event DECLARATION RE: LOST ORIGINAL RENTAL AGREEMENT, THREE DAY NOTICE AND PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Docket Event RECEIVED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, CLERK'S JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
Docket Event REQUEST FOR DEFAULT REJECTED, NOTICE MAILED, SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
Docket Event RECEIVED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, CLERK'S JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY AS TO DEFENDANT TADESSE, SHIMELIS
See all events