We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Henry Alan Howard Vs. Tenants And Owners Development Corp. Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 10 months ago

Howard, Henry Alan 241 -, filed a(n) Money case against Knox Partners Lp Dba Knox Sro 230 -, Tenants And Owners Development Corp. 230 -, Todco Vbc 2 Inc., in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts with Donald S. Mitchell presiding.

Case Details for Howard, Henry Alan 241 - v. Knox Partners Lp Dba Knox Sro 230 - , et al.

Judge

Donald S. Mitchell

Filing Date

February 24, 2015

Category

Money

Last Refreshed

August 31, 2023

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

21 days

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Case Cycle Time

21 days

Parties for Howard, Henry Alan 241 - v. Knox Partners Lp Dba Knox Sro 230 - , et al.

Plaintiffs

Howard, Henry Alan 241 -

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Knox Partners Lp Dba Knox Sro 230 -

Tenants And Owners Development Corp. 230 -

Todco Vbc 2 Inc.

Case Events for Howard, Henry Alan 241 - v. Knox Partners Lp Dba Knox Sro 230 - , et al.

Type Description
Hearing PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM

Judge: DONALD S. MITCHELL

Docket Event DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION OF ALL PARTIES AND ALL CAUSES OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CLAIM HEARING OF MAR-25-2015 OFF CALENDAR, DISMISSAL FILED
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF SERVED FEB-27-2015, COURT CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED SERVED AS TO DEFENDANT KNOX PARTNERS LP DBA KNOX SRO
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF SERVED FEB-26-2015, COURT CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED SERVED AS TO DEFENDANT TENANTS AND OWNERS DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF SERVED FEB-27-2015, COURT CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED SERVED AS TO DEFENDANT TODCO/VBC 2 INC. (CA) CORP DBA KNOX SRO
Docket Event MONEY CLAIM OF PLAINTIFF FOR $814.00 FILED BY HOWARD, HENRY ALAN AS TO DEFENDANT TENANTS AND OWNERS DEVELOPMENT CORP. KNOX PARTNERS LP DBA KNOX SRO ORDER SETTING TRIAL ISSUED FOR MAR-25-2015 AT 08:30 AM IN DEPT 506
Docket Event REQUEST TO WAIVE COURT FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO G.C. 68633, CRC 3.51, 8.26, AND 8.818 (CONFIDENTIAL) FILED BY PLAINTIFF HOWARD, HENRY ALAN ORDER FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS GRANTED PURSUANT TO G.C. 68634 (E), CRC 3.52
Docket Event SERVICE OF COMPLAINT BY CERTIFIED MAIL FILED BY PLAINTIFF HOWARD, HENRY ALAN AS TO DEFENDANT KNOX PARTNERS LP DBA KNOX SRO
Docket Event SERVICE OF COMPLAINT BY CERTIFIED MAIL FILED BY PLAINTIFF HOWARD, HENRY ALAN AS TO DEFENDANT TODCO/VBC 2 INC. (CA) CORP DBA KNOX SRO
Docket Event SERVICE OF COMPLAINT BY CERTIFIED MAIL FILED BY PLAINTIFF HOWARD, HENRY ALAN AS TO DEFENDANT TENANTS AND OWNERS DEVELOPMENT CORP.
See all events

Related Content in San Francisco County

Case

NOELLE DAVIS VS. MINDFUL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ET AL
Jul 18, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | WRONGFUL DISCHARGE | WRONGFUL DISCHARGE | CGC24616556

Case

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS LLC VS. GINNO BERGUNIO ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616585

Case

QUEENS SF, LLC VS. CHASE KELLLEY
Jul 23, 2024 | MONEY | MONEY | CSM24868662

Case

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. SERGIO R ZAMORA ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616706

Case

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. LINH LY MARTINEZ
Jul 23, 2024 | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | FCS24356962

Case

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS. DANIEL M BUCAO JR
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616547

Case

DISCOVER BANK VS. JESSICA KWOK
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616570

Case

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS. WEIJIE LUO
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616583

Case

KELLI MARTIN VS. VICTOR ENDERIZ
Jul 25, 2024 | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITHOUT CHILDREN | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITHOUT CHILDREN | FDI24800024

Ruling

KEEP AMERICA SAFE AND BEAUTIFUL VS. FLORAFLEX CORP. ET AL
Jul 24, 2024 | CGC23603959
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 24, 2024, Line 2. DEFENDANT FLORAFLEX CORP.'s DEMURRER to COMPLAINT. Off calendar. The Cole declaration fails to describe the "means" by which the parties met and conferred, which CCP 430.41(a)(3)(A) requires. The parties are ordered to comply with the code. The response to the complaint is now due by August 23, 2024. =(302/RBU)

Ruling

CAILIN HARDELL VS. BLUMBERG CAPITAL ET AL
Jul 25, 2024 | CGC22602112
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, Jul-25-2024, Line 3, PLAINTIFF CAILIN HARDELL'S Motion To Compel Further Discovery Of Documents And Information From Defendant Blumberg Capital L.L.C. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Parties to appear, hearing required. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)

Ruling

GAETANI REAL ESTATE VS. ZACHARY HOWITT ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 | CUD23672769
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2024 line 5. DEFENDANT ZACHARY HOWITT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Hearing Required. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

ESTEBAN SAMORA SERRANO VS. ANTOLINI LUIGI&C. S.P.A. ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 | CGC24614333
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Monday, July 22, 2024, Line 9. 2 - DEFENDANT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Granted in part. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)

Ruling

BRITTNEY PATTERSON VS. BAY AREA PL SERVICES D/B/A BAYPLS, A CALIFORNIA ET AL
Jul 25, 2024 | CGC23608916
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, Jul-25-2024, Line 6, 4-PLAINTIFF BRITTNEY PATTERSON , AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Subpoena For Production Of Business Records To Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento Medical Center. Off calendar per plaintiff's notice of dismissal filed July 3, 2024. (D302)

Ruling

RAFAEL GARCIA-GUERRA ET AL VS. ANTOLINI LUIGI & C. S.P.A. ET AL
Jul 26, 2024 | CGC23611154
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Friday, July 26, 2024, Line 11. 1 - DEFENDANT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION's DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT. Continued to August 8, 2024, on the court's motion. =(302/RCE)

Ruling

JAIRO REGALADO CANCHOLA ET AL VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC, ET AL
Jul 26, 2024 | CGC23610505
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, Jul-26-2024, Line 9, 2-PLAINTIFFS JAIRO CANCHOLA AN INDIVIDUAL, and ANDREA RODRIGUEZ' Motion To Compel Responses, Without Objections, To Plaintiffs' Requests For Production Of Documents (Set One). Continued on the court's motion to August 21, 2024. (D302)

Ruling

MARCUS NUNES VS. MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), INC., A ET AL
Jul 22, 2024 | CGC23608047
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Monday, July 22, 2024, Line 3. DEFENDANT MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), INC. AND MICHAEL KORS STORES (CALIFORNIA), LLC's Motion To Stay. Off calendar. Motion withdrawn on July 8, 2024. =(302/CK)

Document

CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS. EDWIN F GONZALEZ
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616616

Document

CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS. JAMES K LEUNG ET AL
Jul 24, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616749

Document

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS. MARIO C GOMEZ
Jul 19, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616607

Document

KRISTENE RUDDLE VS. SAN FRANCISCO DELUXE TOURS ET AL
Jul 24, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | CGC24616739

Document

BLUE HILL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS. NELSON JINSOO SHIN ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | CGC24616677

Document

JOHN DOE PWNG 001 VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL
Jul 19, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | MASS TORT | MASS TORT | CGC24616596

Document

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS. YUI M MAK
Jul 22, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616627

Document

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. VS. BRYAN R PAIGE JR
Jul 24, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616723