1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. San Francisco County Superior Courts
  5. Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

Case Last Refreshed: 9 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Catalinac, Kate, filed a(n) Confirm,Vacate Arbitration - Arbitration case against Figueroa, Robert, in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts with Ethan P. Schulman presiding.

Case Details for Catalinac, Kate v. Figueroa, Robert

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Ethan P. Schulman

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

July 15, 2021

Category

Petition Re: Arbitration (Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award)

Last Refreshed

August 31, 2023

Practice Area

Arbitration

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

Confirm,Vacate Arbitration

Parties for Catalinac, Kate v. Figueroa, Robert

Plaintiffs

Catalinac, Kate

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Figueroa, Robert

Other Parties

Pro Per (Attorney)

Case Documents for Catalinac, Kate v. Figueroa, Robert

for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE

Date: July 15, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER KATE CATALINACS' MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD

Date: September 09, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

COST BILL AFTER JUDGMENT, $.00 CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED, $.00 INTEREST, $1,785.00 COSTS FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE

Date: March 11, 2022
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

PETITIONER KATE CATALINACS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE HEARING SET FOR SEP-09-2021 AT 09:30 AM IN DEPT 302

Date: July 15, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE RECOVER FROM RESPONDENT FIGUEROA, ROBERT DBA EMPIRE MOVING SERVICES, LLC. $14,208.00 PRINCIPAL, $1,172.50 COSTS, $460.00 FILING FEES, TOTAL JUDGMENT $15,840.50, - JUDGMENT ON ARBITRATION AWARD - SEE SCANNED DOC

Date: September 09, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE AS TO RESPONDENT FIGUEROA, ROBERT DBA EMPIRE MOVING SERVICES, LLC.

Date: July 15, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

PROOF OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD/ (SERVED BY MAIL) FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE

Date: October 08, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

POS RE: PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD; NTC OF MTN AND CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE

Date: August 11, 2021
for Kate Catalinac Vs. Robert Figueroa

PROOF OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD / (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE

Date: October 08, 2021

Case Events for Catalinac, Kate v. Figueroa, Robert

Date Type Description
March 11, 2022 Docket Event COST BILL AFTER JUDGMENT, $.00 CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED, $.00 INTEREST, $1,785.00 COSTS FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE
View Document
March 11, 2022 Docket Event EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY AS TO RESPONDENT FIGUEROA, ROBERT DBA EMPIRE MOVING SERVICES, LLC.
December 28, 2021 Docket Event ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED TO PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE
October 08, 2021 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD/ (SERVED BY MAIL) FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE
View Document
October 08, 2021 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD / (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) FILED BY PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE
View Document
September 09, 2021 Tentative Ruling Matter on calendar for Thursday, September 9, 2021, Line 1 PETITIONER KATE CATALINAC'S Motion To Confirm The Arbitration Award. Grant. No opposition filed. Petitioner is required to prepare a proposed...
September 09, 2021 Docket Event ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER KATE CATALINACS' MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD
View Document
September 09, 2021 Docket Event THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PETITIONER CATALINAC, KATE RECOVER FROM RESPONDENT FIGUEROA, ROBERT DBA EMPIRE MOVING SERVICES, LLC. $14,208.00 PRINCIPAL, $1,172.50 COSTS, $460.00 FILING FEES, TOTAL JUDGMENT $15,840.50, - JUDGMENT ON ARBITRATION AWARD - SEE SCANNED DOC
View Document
September 09, 2021 Hearing Petitioner Kate Catalinacs' Notice Of Motion And Motion To Confirm The Arbitration Award

Judge: ETHAN P. SCHULMAN
September 09, 2021 Docket Event LAW AND MOTION 302, PETITIONER KATE CATALINAC'S MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD. GRANT. NO OPPOSITION FILED. PETITIONER IS REQUIRED TO PREPARE A PROPOSED ORDER WHICH STATES THAT THE MOTION WAS NOT OPPOSED AND A SEPARATE PROPOSED JUDGMENT WHICH RECITES ALL THE TERMS OF RELIEF MADE IN THE ARBITRATION AWARD. JUDGE: ETHAN P. SCHULMAN, CLERK: S. LE, COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR#8600, MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM, REPORTED. =(302/EPS)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.