In Re: Nailia Ildarovna Rakhmatullina

Set for Discovery on Thursday, July 11, 2024 Line 3, DEFENDANT HOBAN LAW GROUP, PC A COLORADO PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, ROBERT HOBAN's MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO ADMISSION/INTERROGATORIES. Continued to Jul 25, 2024. No JPT available. =(302/JPT)

Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Thursday, July 11, 2024, Line 15. PLAINTIFF PEOPLE CENTER, INC. D/B/A RIPPLING's Motion For Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling's motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 1:30 p.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)

Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, Jul-12-2024, Line 4, PLAINTIFF EDNA CAMPBELL'S Motion To Quash Or Modify Defendant Pacific Maritime Association's Subpoena For Records. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Plaintiff's motion to quash or modify Defendant Pacific Maritime Association's subpoena for records is denied for failure to provide the court with a separate statement as required by CRC 3.1345(a)(5). St. Mary v. Superior Court, 223 Cal. App. 4th 762 (2014); Mills v. U.S. Bank, 166 Cal. App. 4th 871, 892-893 (2008). Plaintiff's motion is also denied on the basis that the motion lacks a declaration demonstrating any meet and confer efforts as required by C.C.P. Sec. 2016.040. C.C.P. Sec. 2025.410(c). For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)

Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, Jul-12-2024, Line 3, PLAINTIFF DARIO ABRAMSKIEHN'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO REQUEST, DEMAND INSPECTION, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: The unopposed motion of Plaintiff is denied as the time for a motion to compel further responses pursuant to C.C.P. Secs. 2023.300 and 2031.310 has passed, and the parties did not have a "specific later date to which the propounding party and the responding party have agreed in writing," therefore, the moving party has waived any right to compel a further response. C.C.P. Secs. 2023.300(c), 2031.310(c); Sexton v. Superior Court, 58 Cal. App. 4th 1403, 1410 (1997). The Court also notes that this motion improperly combined various motions with different procedural and substantive requirements and violates the filing fee requirements of Govt. C. Sec. 70617(a)(f). The Court further notes that the moving party did not comply with local rules applicable to discovery motions, including courtesy copies requirement. Parties are reminded to adhere to all applicable rules, including applicable local rules. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)

Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 9. DEFENDANT JOSEPH LONSDALE's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Continued to August 23, 2024 per stipulation of both parties. =(302/RBU)

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 11, 2024 line 2. DEFENDANT BRENDAN WEE, ERIKA HILTON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is Off Calendar - Per request of moving party. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 REMY TAHIR GOODE, ) Case Number: FDI-23-798739 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 11, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 LEONARD GOODE, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: ANNE COSTIN ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), SPOUSAL OR 13 PARTNER SUPPORT (FILED BY RESPONDENT LEONARD GOODE ON 3/15/2024) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) On for hearing is Respondent (Father)’s Request for Order filed 3/15/2024 asking the Court to 19 modify and enforce the visitation order and to terminate the spousal support order set forth in the 20 Stipulation and Order filed 11/8/2023 in related Case No. FDV-23-816950. 21 2) On 6/27/2024, Petitioner (Mother) filed a Responsive Declaration asking the Court to modify the 22 visitation order and to maintain the spousal support order set forth in the Stipulation and Order 23 filed 11/8/2023 in related Case No. FDV-23-816950. Mother also requests $40,000 in need-based 24 attorney’s fees and costs. 25 3) The Court notes that Father failed to file an Income and Expense Declaration, as required by 26 California Rules of Court, rule 5.92. 27 4) The Court also notes that Father did not file a Reply Declaration. 28 29 1 B. Findings and Orders 2 1) Visitation 3 a. The Court grants Father’s request to enforce the visitation agreements contained in 4 Paragraphs 4-8 of the parties November 2023 Stipulation and Order. 5 b. The parties agree that Alexandra Rasca, the previously identified individual to supervise 6 visitation, is not available to act in that capacity. The Court further finds that the parties 7 have not been able to agree on another supervisor as provided in Paragraph 4 of the 8 November 2023 Stipulation and Order. 9 c. On or before July 26, 2024, Mother is ordered to provide Father with a list of three 10 proposed visitation supervisors who have not previously been identified by either 11 party. These individuals shall have a minimum of two years prior childcare experience, 12 and if necessary may be identified through a professional childcare agency. 13 d. On or before August 2, 2024, Father is to advise Mother of which one of the identified 14 supervisors he agrees to. 15 e. Father’s in-person visits with Riley shall commence the week of August 19, 2024. 16 f. A review hearing regarding visitation is set for Tuesday, 10/15/2024 at 9:00 AM in Dept 17 404. 18 g. The Parties are ordered to file and serve updated declarations 10 days before this review 19 hearing to provide the Court with an update about the status of visitation time. 20 h. The parties are reminded to check the Court website the day before the review hearing by 21 2:00pm for the Court’s tentative ruling. 22 2) Temporary Spousal Support 23 a. The hearing on Father’s request to terminate the temporary spousal support order is 24 continued to Tuesday, 10/15/2024 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 404. 25 b. At least 20 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Father shall file and serve a fully 26 completed updated Income and Expense Declaration and Mother shall file and serve a 27 declaration providing details regarding her current cybersecurity degree program, 28 including when she began her program, when she anticipates her program will be 29 completed, what salary she expects to earn immediately upon graduation and what salary 1 range she expects to earn after she has had a few years of experience, what is the tuition 2 rate for her program, and how she is currently covering any tuition for her program. 3 c. When the parties serve their updated declarations regarding visitation time as set forth 4 above, the parties shall also provide any relevant updates regarding temporary spousal 5 support. 6 d. Pending the next hearing date, the spousal support order set forth in the Stipulation and 7 Order filed 11/8/2023 in related Case No. FDV-23-816950 shall remain in full force and 8 effect. 9 3) Attorney’s Fees 10 a. Although not raised in Father’s Request for Order, the Court finds that it has authority, 11 under Family Code section 2031, to address Mother’s request for need-based attorney’s 12 fees raised in her Responsive Declaration. 13 b. The Court finds, based on Mother’s unrefuted assertions set forth in her Responsive 14 Declaration and supporting pleadings, that there is a significant disparity in access to 15 funds to pay attorney’s fees and costs and that Father has the ability to pay the fees 16 awarded as follows. The Court hereby awards to Mother $25,000 in attorney’s fees and 17 costs for fees incurred to date and for future fees to address custody, visitation, child 18 support, spousal support, date of separation, enforceability of premarital agreement, 19 property division, and reimbursement claims, which the Court finds is a reasonable fee 20 award given the procedural history and issues that need to be adjudicated in this case. The 21 $25,000 shall be paid to Mother no later than 8/11/2024 at 5:00 PM. 22 c. The Court’s jurisdiction to augment this fee award is reserved upon a showing of good 23 cause. 24 d. The Court’s jurisdiction to make an additional award for fees incurred for Mother to 25 specifically pursue the Request for DVRO is also reserved as Mother has not provided (a) 26 an explanation regarding what fees were specifically incurred to adjudicate just her 27 Request for DVRO and (b) an analysis under Family Code section 6344. 28 4) Preparation of Order 29 a. Father’s attorney shall prepare the order. 1 b. Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing 2 – within 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to 3 the other party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of 4 Court, Rule 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was 5 uncontested, submit the proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to 6 submit the order after hearing within 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a 7 proposed order and submit it to the court in accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 8 5.125(d). 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 10, 2024 line 8. PLAINTIFF JOSEPH UNIACKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE JOSEPH AND MARY UNIACKE REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED JUNE 6, 2019, MARY UNIACKE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is GRANTED, subject to opposition. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.