We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

In Re: Adam Matthew Pirtle

Case Last Refreshed: 3 months ago

Pirtle, Adam Matthew, filed a(n) Name Change - Family case in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts Superior.

Case Details for Pirtle, Adam Matthew v.

Filing Date

April 05, 2024

Category

Petition For Change Of Name

Last Refreshed

April 07, 2024

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

Name Change

Filing Court House

Superior

Parties for Pirtle, Adam Matthew v.

Plaintiffs

Pirtle, Adam Matthew

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Other Parties

Pro Per (Attorney)

Case Events for Pirtle, Adam Matthew v.

Type Description
Hearing NAME CHANGE CALENDAR
Docket Event ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME FILED BY PETITIONER PIRTLE, ADAM MATTHEW HEARING SET FOR JUL-11-2024 AT 09:00 AM IN DEPT 103N
Docket Event PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME, RESIDENCY VERIFIED, FILED BY PETITIONER PIRTLE, ADAM MATTHEW JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED
See all events

Related Content in San Francisco County

Case

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. JOSE ARNULFO MARTINEZ RIVERA
Jul 15, 2024 | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | FCS24356941

Case

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. RICARDO ANASTACIO COUOH CHAN
Jul 15, 2024 | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT REGARDING PARENTAL OBLIGATIONS | FCS24356948

Case

YONGLIAN LI VS. MEN YEE LAU
Jul 19, 2024 | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | FDI24800003

Case

BENJAMIN GUZMAN MORAN VS. GABRIELA SOUZA BITENCOURT
Jul 17, 2024 | PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP | PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP | FPT24378442

Case

IN RE: MALI LEE
Jul 18, 2024 | PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME | PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME | CNC24558971

Case

FATIMA PATRICIA HERNANDEZ VS. JAIME ENRIQUE VASQUEZ
Jul 17, 2024 | Russell S. Roeca | PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN | PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN | FMS24387520

Case

ANIELKA JUNNIETH CORDOBA MONTIEL VS. RAUL HEBERTHO PORTILLO BLANDON
Jul 18, 2024 | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION WITH CHILDREN | FDI24799996

Case

CITADEL MANGONON VS. LYNDON MANGONON
Jul 17, 2024 | CUSTODY ORDER: JUVENILE | CUSTODY ORDER: JUVENILE | FLD24397199

Case

TAMIKA YVETTE KING VS. DARRYL ANTOINE KING
Jul 17, 2024 | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION WITH CHILDREN | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION WITH CHILDREN | FDV24817725

Ruling

TRAVIS BRYANT ET AL VS. NICHOLAS SPENCER FIRTH ET AL
Jul 18, 2024 | CGC22601470
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 18, 2024 line 5. DEFENDANT ACRYLIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD is OFF CALENDAR. Re-noticed for July 30, 2024. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

FDI-03-753245
Jul 18, 2024 | FDI-03-753245
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 RACQUEL DECASTRO, ) Case Number: FDI-03-753245 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 18, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 RONALD DECASTRO, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: ANNE COSTIN ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER : WAIVE RESPONDENTS DISCLOSURE TO FINALIZE DISSOLUTION 13 AND BIFUCATION OF MARRIAGE 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) On for hearing is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 2/23/2024 asking the Court to permit her to 19 (a) waive receipt of Respondent’s Final Declaration of Disclosure and (b) bifurcate and terminate 20 the parties’ marital status. 21 2) This Request for Order was previously set to be heard on 4/30/2024, but was continued to 22 7/18/2024 due to a lack of Proof of Service on file. 23 3) On 6/11/2024, Petitioner filed a Proof of Service indicating that Petitioner’s Request for Order 24 and Order for Rescheduled Hearing were personally served on Respondent on 6/15/2024. 25 4) Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration. 26 5) The Court notes that Petitioner submitted a proposed Judgment for the Court’s review back in 27 2021. According to a Reject Letter that was issued on 11/17/2021, that proposed Judgment was 28 rejected due to various deficiencies in the proposed Judgment paperwork. There is no indication 29 1 in the Court’s file that a corrected proposed Judgment packet was submitted to the Court after the 2 11/17/2021 Reject Letter was issued. 3 B. Findings and Orders 4 1) Per Family Code section 2107, in order for the Court to grant a party’s voluntary waiver of 5 receipt of the final declaration of disclosure, the party making the request must show that he or 6 she is in compliance with service of his or her own final declaration of disclosure. There is no 7 Declaration Regarding Service form (using the mandatory Judicial Council Form FL-141) on file 8 showing service of Petitioner’s Final Declaration of Disclosure. 9 2) Moreover, Petitioner’s request to bifurcate and terminate the parties’ marital status is lacking the 10 accompanying requisite Request for Separate Trial form (Judicial Council Form FL-315) on file. 11 3) The hearing on Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 2/23/2024 is continued to Tuesday, 10/1/2024 12 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 404. 13 4) At least 20 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Petitioner shall: 14 a. Serve her Final Declaration of Disclosure; 15 b. File and serve a Declaration Regarding Service of her Final Declaration of Disclosure 16 (using the mandatory Judicial Council Form FL-141); and 17 c. File and serve a declaration (Petitioner may use Judicial Council Form MC-030) to which 18 a fully completed Request for Separate Trial form (Judicial Council Form FL-315) is 19 attached. 20 5) Petitioner may serve the necessary pleadings outlined above by mail. 21 6) Petitioner is strongly encouraged to seek assistance from the ACCESS Center to obtain guidance 22 regarding how to comply with the orders set forth above. Information for the ACCESS Center is 23 located here: https://sf.courts.ca.gov/self-help. 24 7) The Court will prepare the written order after hearing. The Court will also mail a copy of the 25 Tentative Ruling Instructions to the parties. 26 27 28 29 1

Ruling

VALERIE CHEW, TRUSTEE OF THE VALERIE J.CHEW VS. RUDY KING CHEW ET AL
Jul 16, 2024 | CGC22598225
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 16, 2024 line 2. OTHER MATTHEW TAYLOR Notice Of Motion And Motion For Instructions To End Partition By Appraisal And Commence Partition By Sale; Declaration Of Partition Referee is GRANTED. Referee may proceed with partition by sale process. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

KIMBERLY JOHNSON VS. ONPOINT LOGISTICS LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL
Jul 18, 2024 | CGC24612665
Matter on the Law & Motion Calendar for Thursday, July 18, 2024, Line 9. 2 - DEFENDANT AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC's MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. The joinder is unopposed and granted. See order on companion motion to compel arbitration. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)

Ruling

LISA ARNOLD VS. CLARA ANI BISHOP ET AL
Jul 16, 2024 | CGC22601123
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 16, 2024, Line 4. 1 - DEFENDANT FCA, US, LLC's Motion To Transfer Venue To San Bernardino County. Denied. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CK)

Ruling

DAVID PLEIMANN VS. ROBBY PHILLIPS ET AL
Jul 17, 2024 | CGC21594349
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 17, 2024 line 2. PLAINTIFF DAVID PLEIMANN , AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Terms Of Stipulation For Settlement is DENIED. This motion is based on a purported breach of a settlement agreement, however moving party failed to present evidence of breach. The Court also notes that Declaration of David Pleimann in support of this motion purports to include two exhibits, which are not attached. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear.

Ruling

ONWARD PARTNERS, A NEVADA CORPORATION DBA ONWARD VS. QUENTIN COTILLARD, AN INDIVIDUAL ET AL
Jul 19, 2024 | CGC23607150
Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Friday, July 19, 2024, line 4, DEFENDANT QUENTIN COTILLARD, AN INDIVIDUAL NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 15.1 AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS (PART 3 OF 3 TENTATIVE RULING) Cotillard's challenges to the listing of individuals and documents amount, in large part, to a complaint that "there must be more than that". Notwithstanding Cotillard's skepticism, Loomis has identified the persons upon whom he will rely and listed documents that he will use in support of his claims, denials and affirmative defenses, such as they are. Since it appears Loomis/cross-defendant have abandoned their previous (and insufficient) response that, as paraphrased, "you can find the facts in the emails and accounting records", there is no good cause to compel further responses to No. 15.1's second prong. That portion of the pending motion is DENIED. On the subject of sanctions, Loomis and cross-defendant did not have substantial justification for first ignoring and then refusing to provide responses to No. 15.1's first prong, as set forth above. Accordingly, sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $2,100.00, half of the requested amount reflecting half of the motion to compel being granted and half denied. Sanctions are awarded against cross-defendant and Loomis jointly and severally and are payable within 15 days of the date of the order memorializing these rulings. Counsel for Cotillard is directed to prepare a form of proposed order consistent with the foregoing and submit it to psw@hassard.com for review and signature. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to psw@hassard.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. (end of tentativer ruling part 3 of 3) = (302/JPT)

Ruling

JAMES ZORDANI ET AL VS. GIGSTER INC. ET AL
Jul 19, 2024 | CGC23611071
Matter on the Law and Motion Calendar for Friday, July 19, 2024, Line 11. CROSS DEFENDANT ELASTECH SERVICES LLC's MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS. Continued to August 16, 2024, on the court's motion. Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person should report to Dept. 301. However, anyone intending to appear remotely should use the regular Zoom information for Dept. 302's Law & Motion Calendar for 9:30 a.m. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address =(302/RCE)

Document

LUIS A. MARES ET AL VS. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL
Jul 15, 2024 | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CONTRACT/WARRANTY | CGC24616397

Document

DAVID VILLANUEVA VS. JACKIE HUBBS ET AL
Jul 16, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED | CGC24616470

Document

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. GENEVIEVE MENENDEZ ET AL
Jul 16, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616425

Document

WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC, DBA WESTLAKE VS. FERNANDO MALDONADO ET AL
Jul 15, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616402

Document

HERTZ CORPORATION VS. ANDREW TRADER ET AL
Jul 17, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616493

Document

ANTHONY TRAVIS VS. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL
Jul 20, 2022 | SAMUEL K. FENG | CIVIL RIGHTS | CIVIL RIGHTS | CGC22600832

Document

TYLER SANDECKI VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL
Jul 16, 2024 | Anne-Christine Massullo | MASS TORT | MASS TORT | CGC24616457

Document

WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC, DBA WESTLAKE VS. FERNANDO MALDONADO ET AL
Jul 15, 2024 | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740) | CGC24616402