We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Torres -V - General Motors Llc Et Al Print

Case Last Refreshed: 3 weeks ago

Torres, Daladiel, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Knight Law Group, Llp, against Does 1-10, General Motors Llc, represented by Erskine Law Group, Pc, The Erskine Law Group, Apc, The Erskine Law Group Pc, in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. This case was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Courts Superior with Donald Alvarez presiding.

Case Details for Torres, Daladiel v. Does 1-10 , et al.

Judge

Donald Alvarez

Filing Date

August 19, 2022

Category

Breach Of Contract/Warranty Unlimited

Last Refreshed

April 11, 2024

Practice Area

Commercial

Filing Location

San Bernardino County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filing Court House

Superior

Parties for Torres, Daladiel v. Does 1-10 , et al.

Plaintiffs

Torres, Daladiel

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Knight Law Group, Llp

Defendants

Does 1-10

General Motors Llc

Attorneys for Defendants

Erskine Law Group, Pc

The Erskine Law Group, Apc

The Erskine Law Group Pc

Case Documents for Torres, Daladiel v. Does 1-10 , et al.

Complaint Filed

Date: August 19, 2022

Separate Statement Filed

Date: September 21, 2023

Proof of Service

Date: March 26, 2024

Opposition to Motion Filed

Date: September 21, 2023

Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed

Date: August 19, 2022

Notice of Hearing Sent

Date: October 07, 2022

Demand for Jury Trial Filed

Date: August 19, 2022

Separate Statement Filed

Date: June 20, 2023

Summons Issued and Filed

Date: October 07, 2022

Answer Filed

Date: November 28, 2022

Declaration Filed

Date: September 21, 2023

Stipulation & Order filed

Date: June 06, 2023

Case Events for Torres, Daladiel v. Does 1-10 , et al.

Type Description
Department S23 - SBJC

Judge: Alvarez, Donald

Department S23 - SBJC

Judge: Alvarez, Donald

Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT VEHICLE INSURANCE AND REGISTRATION INCURRED AFTER THE VEHICLE QUALIFIED FOR A REPURCHASE ARE NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER THE SONG- BEVERLY ACT, OR ARE OTHERWISE THE STANDARD COSTS OF OWNERSHIP
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY REGARDING ATTORNEY FEES, ATTORNEY ADVERTISING OR ATTORNEY DRIVEN LITIGATION AND OTHER ATTACK OR CRITICISM OF PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR REFERENCE REGARDING DEFENDANT S ARBITRATION PROGRAM
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT AN AUTHORIZED DEALERSHIP IS NOT DEFENDANT S AGENT DURING WARRANTY REPAIRS AND SALE
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO ANY SETTLEMENT OFFERS OR NEGOTIATIONS
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OR ARGUMENT THAT PLAINTIFFS DID NOT MAKE SUFFICIENT EFFORTS TO ASK DEFENDANT TO REPURCHASE OR REPLACE THE VEHICLE
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7 TO PROHIBIT EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT THAT PLAINTIFFS MISUSED, ABUSED, OR FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE VEHICLE
Docket Event Opposition to Motion in Limine Filed Electronically
GENERAL MOTORS LLC S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO PROHIBIT ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY THAT DEFENDANT CONFORMED THE VEHICLE WITHIN A REASONABLE NUMBER OF REPAIR ATTEMPTS BECAUSE DEFENDANT REPAIRED A PARTICULAR COMPONENT
See all events