1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Contra Costa County Superior Courts
  5. Rang Technologies Inc Vs Zole Inc
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Rang Technologies Inc Vs Zole Inc

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Rang Technologies,Inc, filed a(n) 42: Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec) case represented by Papuc, Michael A, against Nitan Sondhi, Zole Inc, represented by Unrepresented, in the jurisdiction of Contra Costa County. This case was filed in Contra Costa County Superior Courts with Austin, Steven K presiding.

Case Details for Rang Technologies,Inc v. Nitan Sondhi , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Austin, Steven K

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

140 days

Filing Date

October 17, 2016

Category

42: Unlimited Other Complaint (Not Spec)

Last Refreshed

March 06, 2023

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

59 days

Filing Location

Contra Costa County, CA

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

99 days

Parties for Rang Technologies,Inc v. Nitan Sondhi , et al.

Plaintiffs

Rang Technologies,Inc

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Papuc, Michael A

Defendants

Nitan Sondhi

Zole Inc

Attorneys for Defendants

Unrepresented

Case Events for Rang Technologies,Inc v. Nitan Sondhi , et al.

Date Type Description
March 06, 2017 Docket Event *Case Management Conference
March 06, 2017 Docket Event CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
VACATED
March 06, 2017 Docket Event CHECK FOR REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
VACATED
January 24, 2017 Docket Event REQUEST FILED AND DISMISSAL ENTERED WITH PREJUDICEAS TO ENTIRE ACTION CSADBT: Civil SAD Before Trial - NADT%%. EAW: Entire Action Dismissed With Prejudice
Entire action dismissed with prejudice
January 24, 2017 Docket Event REQUEST FILED AND DISMISSAL ENTERED WITH PREJUDICEAS TO ENTIRE ACTION
Not Applicable
January 03, 2017 Docket Event CHECK FOR REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
NOT HEARD/CONT
December 21, 2016 Docket Event CHECK FOR PROOF OF SERVICE
VACATED
December 15, 2016 Docket Event Default Department was changed from 21 to 33.
December 15, 2016 Docket Event DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 21 TO 33.
Not Applicable
December 12, 2016 Docket Event Cases Rescheduled Due to Assignment Change
5CMC4 calendared on 03/06/17 in dept. 21. Has been updated to 03/06/17 in dept. 33.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.