1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. San Bernardino County Superior Courts
  5. Simpson -V- Amrhein Print
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Simpson -V- Amrhein Print

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Simpson, Deborah, filed a(n) Automobile - Torts case represented by Law Office Of Dye & Duque, against Amrhein, Jerome, represented by Ford Walker Haggerty & Behar, in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. This case was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Courts San Bernardino.

Case Details for Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Amrhein, Jerome , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Time To Management

392 days

Filing Date

June 16, 2009

Category

Pi Motor Vehicle

Last Refreshed

October 14, 2022

Practice Area

Torts

Filing Location

San Bernardino County, CA

Matter Type

Automobile

Filing Court House

San Bernardino

Case Cycle Time

847 days

Parties for Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Amrhein, Jerome , et al.

Plaintiffs

Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc.

Simpson, Deborah

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Law Office Of Dye & Duque

Defendants

Amrhein, Jerome

Attorneys for Defendants

Ford Walker Haggerty & Behar

Other Parties

Adelson Testan Brundo & Jimenez (Attorney)

Conv (Conversion Event)

Ford Walker Haggerty & Behar (Attorney)

Case Events for Sedwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Amrhein, Jerome , et al.

Date Type Description
October 12, 2011
October 12, 2011 Docket Event Legacy Minutes
HEARING RE: OSC RE COMPLIANCE DONALD ALVAREZ,JUDGE CLERK: STEPHANIE CHANDLER COURT REPORTER DEBORAH THOMPSON;7079 COURT ATTENDANT E ASHE - APPEARANCES: ATTORNEY BRYAN WHITMER-CABRERA PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. JOHN PAULSON APPEARS BY COURTCALL FOR J
October 12, 2011 Docket Event Legacy Minutes
HEARING RE: OSC RE COMPLIANCE
October 12, 2011 Docket Event Document is Returned by Court for the Following Reason(s):
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): DISMISSAL FILED BY FAX 10/11/11 .
October 11, 2011 Docket Event FEE PAYMENT 111011-1381-MC FAX/ 3.00 PAYMT 111011-1381-MC REFERENCE NUMBER 025-0038954805
October 11, 2011 Docket Event FEE PAYMENT 111011-2601-MC FAX/ 3.00 PAYMT 111011-2601-MC REFERENCE NUMBER 025-0038958416
October 11, 2011 Docket Event Conformed Copies in the Attorney Bin - No Envelope Provided
CONFORMED COPIES IN THE ATTORNEY BIN -- NO ENVELOPE PROVIDED
October 11, 2011 Docket Event REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED- WITH PREJUDICE. STAGE AT DISPOSITION: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL NO ADR BEFORE TRIAL (CIV) DISPOSITION: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL NO ADR BEFORE TRIAL (CIV)
October 11, 2011 Docket Event Comment:
CALLED PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AND INFORMED THEM DISM ISSAL WAS REJECTED DUE TO NO SIGN FROM CC
October 11, 2011 Docket Event Document is Returned by Court for the Following Reason(s):
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): CANNOT DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT CROSS COMPLAI NT'S ATTORNEY SIGNATURE.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.