Cips Marketing Group Inc Vs. S.F. Newspaper Company, Llc, Dba The San Francisco Et Al

2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 BREAUX ALANDER WALKER, ) Case Number: FDI-23-797890 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 25, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 EDITH SILVER WALKER, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: RUSSELL S. ROECA ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR MOVE AWAY AND CUSTODY ORDERS CHILD 13 CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT, MOVE TO MARYLAND 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 Custody Evaluation 18 The parties are currently undergoing a child custody evaluation by Alison Urdan. The Court has not been 19 provided with an update as to the status of the CCE and expected date of receipt of the CCE. This matter 20 is continued to September 24, 2024 for receipt of the CCE. Both parties shall file and serve update 21 declarations directed exclusively at the CCE. 22 Financial 23 This matter is continued from the 5/23/2024 hearing date for child support to be recalculated, as 24 the current child support order was set to $0 on that date. The parties were ordered to file updated income 25 and expense declarations and Statement of Support Calculations, 10 days in advance of the next hearing 26 date. Father failed to provide any of the requested documents. 27 Mother shall serve and file an amended income and expense declaration and attach the check stub 28 for her severance pay and proof of her unemployment income by 5:00pm on 7/25/2024. Mother omitted 29 these required documents from her income and expense declaration. 1 Under Family Code section 4053(a), a parent’s first and principal obligation is to support the 2 parent’s minor children according to the parent’s circumstances and station in life. The Court finds that 3 Father has the ability to work full-time. The Court previously imputed to Father full-time minimum wage 4 income at $3,132 (SF minimum wage) gross per month. The Court finds it is the best interest of the Type text here 5 children to impute Father income in the amount of $20,000 per month, based on representations he made 6 in his 5/16/2024 declaration. 7 A printout of the Dissomaster computer calculation and findings is attached and 8 incorporated in this order. The Court adopts Mother’s Dissomaster A for the time period of 5/1/2024 9 (the date Father started his new position with SunCar) through 7/23/2024 (the date that Mother’s 10 severance ended), Father shall pay to Mother $2,913 per month in guideline child support. Thus, Father 11 shall pay to Mother, child support arrears in the amount of $2,913 for May 2024, $2,913 for June 2024, 12 and $2,161 for July 1-23 2024. The Court adopts Mother’s Dissomaster B for the time period of 13 7/23/2024- current in the amount of $3,829. Father shall pay to Mother child support arrears to Mother in 14 the amount for $988 for 7/24/2024-7/31/2024. Total support arrears owed from Father to Mother for the 15 period of 5/1/2024-7/23/2024 is $8,975. Father shall pay this amount to Mother in six equal payments of 16 $1,495.83 commencing 8/15/2023 and on the 15th of each month thereafter, until paid in full. 17 Commencing 8/1/2024 and going forward, in accordance with Dissomaster B, Father shall pay to 18 Mother $3,829 per month is guideline child support on the first of every month. 19 Once Mother becomes employed, she shall immediately inform Father and schedule a meet and 20 confer, so the parties can stipulate to a guideline child support agreement that comports with the change. 21 Mother shall serve and file the agreement with the Court. 22 Counsel for Mother shall prepare the order. Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the 23 court to prepare the order after hearing – within 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve 24 the proposed order to the other party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA 25 Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, 26 submit the proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing 27 within 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 28 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 29 n'ORNEY (NAME ANOADORESS): TELEPHONE NO: w MOO!Ou- tate of California.County of "to ½o nne Fokstuen Law office of Anne Fokstuen STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: BRANCH NAME: California noRNEY FOR: Mother DISSOMASTER REPORT ASE NUMBER: 2024, Monthly FDI-23-797890 Dissomaster A Input Data Father Mother Guideline (2024) Cash Flow Analysis Father Mother Number of children 0 3 Nets (adjusted) Guideline % time with Second Parent 33% 0% Father 13,498 Payment (cost)/benefit (2,913) 2,913 Filing status HH/MLA HH/MLA Mother 6,633 Net spendable income 10,586 9,545 # Federal exemptions 2 3 Total 20,131 % combined spendable 52.6% 47.4% Wages + salary 20,000 9,068 Support Total taxes 6,502 1,720 401(k) employee contrib 0 0 CS Payor Father Comb. net spendable 20,131 Self-employment income 0 0 Presumed 2,913 Proposed Other taxable income 0 0 Basic CS 2,913 Payment (cost)/benefit (2,913) 2,913 Short-term cap. gains 0 0 Add-ons 0 Net spendable income 10,586 9,545 Long-term cap. gains 0 0 Presumed Per Kid NSI change from gdl 0 0 Other gains (and losses) 0 0 Child 1 554 % combined spendable 52.6% 47.4% Ordinary dividends 0 0 Child 2 866 % of saving over gdl 0% 0% Tax. interest received 0 0 Child 3 1,493 Total taxes 6,502 1,720 Social Security received 0 0 Spousal support blocked Comb. net spendable 20,131 Unemployment compensation 0 0 Total 2,913 Percent change 0.0% Operating losses 0 0 Proposed, tactic 9 Default Case Settings Ca. operating loss adj. 0 0 CS Payor Father Roy, partnerships, S corp, trusts 0 0 Presumed 2,913 Rental income 0 0 Basic CS 2,913 Misc ordinary tax. inc. 0 0 Add-ons 0 Other nontaxable Income 0 0 Presumed Per Kid New-spouse income 0 0 Child 1 554 SS paid other marriage 0 0 Child 2 866 CS paid other relationship 0 0 Child 3 1,493 Adj. to income (ATI) 0 0 Spousal support blocked 9.3% elective PTE payment 0 0 Total 2,913 Ptr Support Pd. other P'ships 0 0 Savings 0 Health insurance 0 715 Mother 0 Qual. Bus. Inc. Ded. 0 0 Father 0 Itemized deductions 0 0 No releases Other medical expenses 0 0 Property tax expenses 0 0 Ded. interest expense 0 0 Charitable contribution 0 0 Miscellaneous itemized 0 0 State sales tax paid 0 0 Required union dues 0 0 Cr. for Pd. Sick and Fam. L. 0 0 Mandatory retirement 0 0 Hardship deduction o· O* Other gdl. adjustments 0 0 AMT Info (IRS Form 6251) 0 0 Cfii... Child support add-ons 0 0 (Rev. Mar, 2024) OlssoMaster™ 2024-1 DissoMaster Report (Monthly) Page I of2 7/15/2024 12:26 PM Anne Fokstuen, Law office of Anne Fokstuen Type text here 3 Type 2 text here 1

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2024 line 7. DEFENDANT ANNA CHALMERS AKA ANNA FERENTINOS DEMURRER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege that Plaintiff does not have a complete copy of the lease or the lease attached to the complaint sans paragraphs 13 (partial), 14 and 15 is the only copy of the lease in Plaintiff's possession. Plaintiff's improper declaration in support of the opposition is stricken and not considered. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2024 line 8. PLAINTIFF JOSEPH UNIACKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE JOSEPH AND MARY UNIACKE REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED JUNE 6, 2019, MARY UNIACKE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is OFF CALENDAR per request of the moving party. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 5 ) 6 LORINA STHAPIT, ) Case Number: FDV-23-816772 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: July 23, 2024 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 PURSARTH TULADHAR, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: RUSSELL S. ROECA ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD SUPPORT 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The matter is transferred to Dept. 416, to be heard at 9:00AM on 7/23/2024. Parties may appear by Zoom 16 or phone. 17 www.zoom.com/join 18 Meeting ID: 161 123 0725 19 Passcode: 040696 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Monday, July 22, 2024, line 5, DEFENDANT DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA'S Motion To Compel Enforcement Of Records Subpoena And Request For Sanctions Against Plaintiff And Plaintiffs Counsel Pro Tem Judge David McDonald, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: Motion granted. The Court notes that Plaintiff agreed to produce documents responsive to the subpoena, except for the emergency contact information. Defendants have a right to confirm that all documents have been produced by Kaiser. Plaintiff shall execute an authorization to Kaiser allowing production absent the emergency contact information. Sanctions of $950 imposed against Plaintiff. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to davididaho14@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/JPT)

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 23, 2024 line 2. DEFENDANT BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK , AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWHEQ REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2007-A, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC DEMURRER TO 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT is continued to September 13, 2024. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2024 line 5. DEFENDANT ZACHARY HOWITT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Hearing Required. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear.

Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Friday, July 26, 2024, Line 5. DEFENDANT ROBERT ELAM's Motion For Relief From Default. The motion is ordered off calendar to enable the moving party to comply with Local Rule 2.7(B) (courtesy copies). =(302/RCE)