1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. San Francisco County Superior Courts
  5. Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 9 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Target National Bank, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Adkins, Brian, against Does 1 To 10, Moran, William D., in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Target National Bank v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

April 15, 2010

Category

Exempt Collections (Rule 3.740)

Last Refreshed

August 31, 2023

Practice Area

Creditor

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

71 days

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Case Cycle Time

883 days

Case Complaint Summary

This complaint is a document related to a legal case between Target National Bank and William D. Moran. The document is a proof of service of summons, indicating that the defendant, William D. Moran, was served with the necessary legal documents. The...

Subscribe to see entire Complaint Summary

Parties for Target National Bank v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Plaintiffs

Target National Bank

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Adkins, Brian

Defendants

Does 1 To 10

Moran, William D.

Case Documents for Target National Bank v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT DOES 1 TO 10

Date: June 25, 2010
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

COST BILL AFTER JUDGMENT, $318.18 CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED, $942.39 INTEREST, $46.00 COSTS FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK

Date: January 23, 2012
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN MATEO COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, UNSATISFIED AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.

Date: September 14, 2012
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

UNDER APPLICATION TO THE CLERK FOR JUDGMENT UNDER SEC 585(1) C.C.P., IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK RECOVER FROM DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D. $6,603.80 PRINCIPAL, $269.50 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $6,873.30, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

Date: June 25, 2010
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, PARTIALLY SATISFIED IN THE SUM OF $4,334.52 AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.

Date: August 02, 2012
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

AMENDED SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT, PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK SERVED MAY-03-2010, SUBSTITUTE SERVICE ON NATURAL PERSON AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.

Date: May 11, 2010
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT, PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK SERVED MAY-03-2010, SUBSTITUTE SERVICE ON NATURAL PERSON AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.

Date: May 04, 2010
for Target National Bank Vs. William D. Moran Et Al

EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740), COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D. DOES 1 TO 10 SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON OCT-12-2010

Date: April 15, 2010

Case Events for Target National Bank v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Date Type Description
September 14, 2012 Docket Event RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN MATEO COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, UNSATISFIED AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.
View Document
August 02, 2012 Docket Event RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, PARTIALLY SATISFIED IN THE SUM OF $4,334.52 AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.
View Document
January 23, 2012 Docket Event COST BILL AFTER JUDGMENT, $318.18 CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED, $942.39 INTEREST, $46.00 COSTS FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK
View Document
January 23, 2012 Docket Event EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN MATEO COUNTY AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.
January 26, 2011 Docket Event COST BILL AFTER JUDGMENT, $.00 CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED, $376.62 INTEREST, $.00 COSTS FILED BY PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK
January 26, 2011 Docket Event EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY AS TO DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D.
July 29, 2010 Docket Event ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED TO PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK
July 14, 2010 Docket Event CRC 3.740 REVIEW - JUDGMENT ON FILE
June 25, 2010 Docket Event DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT DOES 1 TO 10
View Document
June 25, 2010 Docket Event UNDER APPLICATION TO THE CLERK FOR JUDGMENT UNDER SEC 585(1) C.C.P., IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF TARGET NATIONAL BANK RECOVER FROM DEFENDANT MORAN, WILLIAM D. $6,603.80 PRINCIPAL, $269.50 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $6,873.30, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT
View Document
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.