1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. San Francisco County Superior Courts
  5. Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 8 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Stewart, Mark, filed a(n) Civil case represented by Pro Per, against City And County Of San Francisco, City Of San Francisco Sfpd, Does One Through Fifteen, Does One Through Five Thousand, State Of California Chp, (total of 5) See All represented by Monson, Lauren M., in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts with Arlene T. Borick presiding.

Case Details for Stewart, Mark v. City And County Of San Francisco , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Arlene T. Borick

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

April 13, 2009

Category

Civil

Last Refreshed

August 31, 2023

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

57 days

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Case Cycle Time

140 days

Parties for Stewart, Mark v. City And County Of San Francisco , et al.

Plaintiffs

Stewart, Mark

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Pro Per

Defendants

City And County Of San Francisco

City Of San Francisco Sfpd

Does One Through Fifteen

Does One Through Five Thousand

State Of California Chp

Attorneys for Defendants

Monson, Lauren M.

Case Documents for Stewart, Mark v. City And County Of San Francisco , et al.

for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF STEWART, MARK AS TO DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DOES ONE THROUGH FIFTEEN

Date: June 01, 2009
for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

CIVIL RIGHTS, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF STEWART, MARK AS TO DEFENDANT STATE OF CALIFORNIA/CHP CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO/SFPD DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE THOUSAND SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR SEP-11-2009 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON JUN-12-2009 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON AUG-27-2009

Date: April 13, 2009
for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF SEP-11-2009 IS OFF CALENDAR DISMISSAL ON FILE. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.

Date: August 31, 2009
for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

Date: April 13, 2009
for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

ORDER SUSTAINING THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART)

Date: July 28, 2009
for Mark Stewart Vs. State Of California/Chp Et Al

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (IN ITS ENTIRETY)

Date: August 18, 2009

Case Events for Stewart, Mark v. City And County Of San Francisco , et al.

Date Type Description
September 11, 2009 Hearing CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Judge: ARLENE T. BORICK
August 31, 2009 Docket Event CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF SEP-11-2009 IS OFF CALENDAR DISMISSAL ON FILE. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.
View Document
August 18, 2009 Docket Event ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (IN ITS ENTIRETY)
View Document
August 18, 2009 Docket Event EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, DECLARATION FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
August 18, 2009 Docket Event NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
August 18, 2009 Docket Event CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ESTIMATED TIME FOR TRIAL: 2.0 DAYS
August 12, 2009 Docket Event NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF MONSON, LAUREN M. ON AUG-21-2009 THROUGH SEP-14-2009 FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
July 29, 2009 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY PERSONAL SERVICE OF ORDER SUSTAINING THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
July 28, 2009 Tentative Ruling DEMURRER TO 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT Set for hearing on Tuesday, July 28, 2009, line 3, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Demurrer is sustained without leave...
July 28, 2009 Docket Event ORDER SUSTAINING THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART)
View Document
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.