1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. San Francisco County Superior Courts
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 8 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A., filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Reese, Harlan M, against Does 1 To 10, Leung, Peter, in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

March 25, 2009

Category

Exempt Collections (Rule 3.740)

Last Refreshed

August 31, 2023

Practice Area

Creditor

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

188 days

Filing Location

San Francisco County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Case Cycle Time

281 days

Parties for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Plaintiffs

Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Reese, Harlan M

Defendants

Does 1 To 10

Leung, Peter

Case Documents for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT DOES 1 TO 10

Date: September 29, 2009
for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al

EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740), COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. AS TO DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER DOES 1 TO 10 SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON SEP-21-2009

Date: March 25, 2009
for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al

THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. RECOVER FROM DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER $17,810.14 PRINCIPAL, $2,125.00 ATTORNEY FEES, $854.98 INTEREST, $384.00 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $21,174.12, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

Date: October 07, 2009
for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. Vs. Peter Leung Et Al

SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT, PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. SERVED MAY-03-2009, SUBSTITUTE SERVICE ON NATURAL PERSON AS TO DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER

Date: May 22, 2009

Case Events for Chase Manhattan Bank Usa, N.A. v. Does 1 To 10 , et al.

Date Type Description
December 31, 2009 Docket Event ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED TO PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.
November 25, 2009 Docket Event CRC 3.740 REVIEW - JUDGMENT ON FILE
October 07, 2009 Docket Event THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. RECOVER FROM DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER $17,810.14 PRINCIPAL, $2,125.00 ATTORNEY FEES, $854.98 INTEREST, $384.00 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $21,174.12, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT
View Document
September 29, 2009 Docket Event DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT DOES 1 TO 10
View Document
September 29, 2009 Docket Event DECLARATION OF MIKE KONRATH RE: CCP 585 - AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. FILED BY PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.
September 29, 2009 Docket Event CASE SUMMARY FILED BY PLAINTIFF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.
September 29, 2009 Docket Event AMENDED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT/DEFAULT ENTERED, COURT JUDGMENT REQUESTED, DECLARATION OF NON-MILITARY STATUS, COST BILL $384.00 FILED, CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGED $.00 AS TO DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER
September 10, 2009 Docket Event CRC 3.740 REVIEW. (212)
July 16, 2009 Docket Event REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT/DEFAULT ENTERED AS TO DEFENDANT LEUNG, PETER
July 09, 2009 Docket Event CRC 3.740 REVIEW. (212)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.