1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Los Angeles County Superior Courts
  5. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner And Smith Inc Vs Richard Cameron
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner And Smith Inc Vs Richard Cameron

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fencer And Smith, filed a(n) General Arbitration - Arbitration case represented by Echavarria Camilo Esq., against Walker Richard Cameron, in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Alan S. Rosenfield presiding.

Case Details for Merrill Lynch Pierce Fencer And Smith v. Walker Richard Cameron

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Alan S. Rosenfield

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

November 19, 2010

Category

Petition To Compel/Confirm/Vacate Arbitration (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

February 07, 2023

Practice Area

Arbitration

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

77 days

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Matter Type

General Arbitration

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Arbitration Award

Case Cycle Time

77 days

Parties for Merrill Lynch Pierce Fencer And Smith v. Walker Richard Cameron

Plaintiffs

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fencer And Smith

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Echavarria Camilo Esq.

Defendants

Walker Richard Cameron

Case Events for Merrill Lynch Pierce Fencer And Smith v. Walker Richard Cameron

Date Type Description
March 21, 2011 Docket Event Minute order entered: 2011-03-21 00:00:00
March 21, 2011 Docket Event Proceeding/Event:Status Conference Alan S. Rosenfield 8:30 am
March 21, 2011 Docket Event in Department 31 Status Conference (Status Conference; Vacated) -
Status Conference (Status Conference; Vacated) -
March 21, 2011 Docket Event in Department 31
Status Conference (Status Conference; Vacated) -
February 10, 2011 Docket Event Document:Abstract of Judgment Filed by: Attorney for Creditor
February 10, 2011 Docket Event Abstract of Judgment - Civil and Small Claims Filed by Creditor
Filed by Creditor
February 10, 2011 Hearing Abstract of Judgment - Civil and Small Claims
Filed by Creditor
February 08, 2011 Docket Event Document:Notice of Ruling Filed by: Attorney for Petitioner
February 08, 2011 Docket Event NOTICE OF RULING
February 08, 2011 Docket Event Notice of Ruling Filed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fencer and Smith (Plaintiff)
Filed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fencer and Smith (Plaintiff)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.