1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Kern County Superior Courts
  5. Wertz Vs Henley Pacific La Llc
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Wertz Vs Henley Pacific La Llc

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Wertz, Aaron, filed a(n) General Employment - Labor and Employment case represented by Gorham, William J., against Henley Pacific La Llc, represented by Todd-Gher, Amy, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Clark, Thomas S. presiding.

Case Details for Wertz, Aaron v. Henley Pacific La Llc

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Clark, Thomas S.

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

180 days

Filing Date

January 09, 2020

Category

15-Cv Other Employment - Civil Unlimited

Last Refreshed

November 21, 2021

Practice Area

Labor and Employment

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

General Employment

Parties for Wertz, Aaron v. Henley Pacific La Llc

Plaintiffs

Wertz, Aaron

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Gorham, William J.

Defendants

Henley Pacific La Llc

Attorneys for Defendants

Todd-Gher, Amy

Case Documents for Wertz, Aaron v. Henley Pacific La Llc

for Wertz Vs Henley Pacific La Llc

Order to Show Cause

Date: January 09, 2020

Case Events for Wertz, Aaron v. Henley Pacific La Llc

Date Type Description
February 03, 2021 Hearing Case Management Conference
**Case Stayed 10/02/2020 ***continued from 07/07/2020

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
February 03, 2021 Docket Event Case Management Conference 07/07/2020
Case Management Conference
**Case Stayed 10/02/2020 ***continued from 07/07/2020

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
October 02, 2020 Hearing Order
Joint Noitce of Pending Settlement and Request to Stay Case and Continue October 6, 2020 Case Management Conference IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED; 2. The Case Management Conference set for October 6, 2020 at 8:15 a.m. is hereby continued until February 3, 2021 at 8:15 a.m 3. This Action is hereby stayed pending a ruling by the Barrett-Frieson court KCSC action no. BCV-19-101595 regarding the Parties' request for approval of their Stipulation and Settlement; and either party may request termination of the stay by noticed motion. 4. The Parties shall promptly notify this Court of a ruling by the Barrett-Frieson court regarding the request for approval of the Parties' proposed PAGA settlement, including specifying whether Plaintiff is requesting dismissal of this Action in light of the ruling.

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
October 02, 2020 Docket Event Order
Joint Noitce of Pending Settlement and Request to Stay Case and Continue October 6, 2020 Case Management Conference IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED; 2. The Case Management Conference set for October 6, 2020 at 8:15 a.m. is hereby continued until February 3, 2021 at 8:15 a.m 3. This Action is hereby stayed pending a ruling by the Barrett-Frieson court KCSC action no. BCV-19-101595 regarding the Parties' request for approval of their Stipulation and Settlement; and either party may request termination of the stay by noticed motion. 4. The Parties shall promptly notify this Court of a ruling by the Barrett-Frieson court regarding the request for approval of the Parties' proposed PAGA settlement, including specifying whether Plaintiff is requesting dismissal of this Action in light of the ruling.

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
October 01, 2020 Hearing Proof of Service
September 21, 2020 Hearing Case Management Statement
August 11, 2020 Hearing Stipulation and Order
Having received the Parties' Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order set forth above and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties and their counsel shall be bound by the terms of the Stipulation and Protective Order and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
August 11, 2020 Docket Event Stipulation and Order
Having received the Parties' Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order set forth above and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties and their counsel shall be bound by the terms of the Stipulation and Protective Order and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge: Clark, Thomas S.
August 06, 2020 Hearing Proof of Service
as to Proposed Stipulation for Protective Order
August 06, 2020 Docket Event Proof of Service
as to Proposed Stipulation for Protective Order
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.