1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Los Angeles County Superior Courts
  5. Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 10 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Lee Ho Ung, filed a(n) Contractual Fraud - Commercial case against Car Lux Inc., Ezzati Hadi, Sunny An, in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Ernest M. Hiroshige presiding.

Case Details for Lee Ho Ung v. Car Lux Inc. , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Ernest M. Hiroshige

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

October 04, 2018

Category

Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

September 06, 2023

Practice Area

Commercial

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Matter Type

Contractual Fraud

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Request For Dismissal - Before Trial Not Following Adr Or More Than 60 Days Since Adr

Case Cycle Time

29 days

Parties for Lee Ho Ung v. Car Lux Inc. , et al.

Plaintiffs

Lee Ho Ung

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Car Lux Inc.

Ezzati Hadi

Sunny An

Case Documents for Lee Ho Ung v. Car Lux Inc. , et al.

for Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

COMPLAINT

Date: October 04, 2018
for Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

SUMMONS -

Date: October 04, 2018
for Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT

Date: October 04, 2018
for Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER -

Date: October 04, 2018
for Ho Ung Lee Vs Car Lux Inc Et Al

Request for Dismissal

Date: November 02, 2018

Complaint

Date: October 04, 2018

Request for Dismissal

Date: November 02, 2018

Case Events for Lee Ho Ung v. Car Lux Inc. , et al.

Date Type Description
November 02, 2018 Request for Dismissal
November 02, 2018 Docket Event Request for Dismissal
Filed by Ho Ung Lee (Plaintiff)
October 04, 2018 COMPLAINT
October 04, 2018 SUMMONS -
October 04, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT
October 04, 2018 ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER -
October 04, 2018 Docket Event NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT
October 04, 2018 Docket Event ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER
October 04, 2018 Docket Event SUMMONS
October 04, 2018 Docket Event Complaint
Filed by Ho Ung Lee (Plaintiff)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.