1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Los Angeles County Superior Courts
  5. Tianna Marie Hale Vs Southern California Edison Company Et A
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Tianna Marie Hale Vs Southern California Edison Company Et A

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Hale Tianna Marie, filed a(n) General Employment - Labor and Employment case represented by Grombchevsky Stan Esq., against Southern California Edison Company, Austin Leroy, represented by Harn William Davis Esq., Buchanan John D., in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Alan S. Rosenfield presiding.

Case Details for Hale Tianna Marie v. Southern California Edison Company , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Alan S. Rosenfield

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

December 02, 2009

Category

Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

February 19, 2021

Practice Area

Labor and Employment

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Matter Type

General Employment

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Deemed Complete (No Remand From Federal Court)

Case Cycle Time

44 days

Parties for Hale Tianna Marie v. Southern California Edison Company , et al.

Plaintiffs

Hale Tianna Marie

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Grombchevsky Stan Esq.

Defendants

Southern California Edison Company

Austin Leroy

Attorneys for Defendants

Harn William Davis Esq.

Buchanan John D.

Case Events for Hale Tianna Marie v. Southern California Edison Company , et al.

Date Type Description
April 01, 2010 Docket Event in Department 31
Case Management Conference (Conference-Case Management; Vacated) -
January 15, 2010 Docket Event in Department 31
Court Order (Court Order; Court makes order) -
January 15, 2010 Docket Event Minute Order
January 13, 2010 Docket Event DEFENDANT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION
January 13, 2010 Docket Event Notice of Filing
Filed by Southern California Edison Company (Defendant)
January 07, 2010 Docket Event Answer
Filed by Southern California Edison Company (Defendant)
January 07, 2010 Docket Event SOUGHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
December 23, 2009 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
December 23, 2009 Docket Event Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Tianna Marie Hale (Plaintiff)
December 08, 2009 Docket Event Notice of Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.