1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Los Angeles County Superior Courts
  5. Pico Company Llc Vs Harpuneet Maju Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Pico Company Llc Vs Harpuneet Maju Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Pico Company Llc, filed a(n) Collections - Creditor case represented by Herzlich Allan Esq., against California Properties Associates, Maju Harpuneet K., Maju Harpuneet, Maple Luggage Inc., in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Abraham Khan presiding.

Case Details for Pico Company Llc v. California Properties Associates , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Abraham Khan

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

133 days

Filing Date

January 28, 2009

Category

Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

February 17, 2023

Practice Area

Creditor

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

300 days

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Matter Type

Collections

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial

Case Cycle Time

348 days

Parties for Pico Company Llc v. California Properties Associates , et al.

Plaintiffs

Pico Company Llc

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Herzlich Allan Esq.

Defendants

California Properties Associates

Maju Harpuneet K.

Maju Harpuneet

Maple Luggage Inc.

Case Events for Pico Company Llc v. California Properties Associates , et al.

Date Type Description
December 27, 2010 Docket Event Minute order entered: 2010-12-27 00:00:00
December 27, 2010 Docket Event Proceeding/Event:Judgment Debtor Examination Hrng Matthew St. George 9:00 am
December 27, 2010 Docket Event in Department 1A Hearing on Application for Order for Appearance and Examination - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court
Hearing on Application for Order for Appearance and Examination - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court
December 27, 2010 Docket Event Minute Order
December 27, 2010 Docket Event in Department 1A
Hearing on Application for Order for Appearance and Examination - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court
November 09, 2010 Docket Event Document:Declaration Filed by: Attorney for Creditor
November 09, 2010 Docket Event Document:Writ issued Filed by: Clerk
November 09, 2010 Docket Event MEMO OF COSTS AFTER JUDGEMENT, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CREDIT AND DECLARATION OF ACCRUED INTEREST
November 09, 2010 Docket Event Declaration Filed by Creditor
Filed by Creditor
November 09, 2010 Docket Event Writ issued Filed by Clerk
Filed by Clerk
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.