1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Los Angeles County Superior Courts
  5. State Of California, Et Al Vs Caremark Rx, Inc, Etc Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

State Of California, Et Al Vs Caremark Rx, Inc, Etc Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Cortes Victor, Fowler Michael, Fowler Peppi, Nevarez Danny, The State Of California, (total of 5) See All filed a(n) Other Complaint (Non-Tort/Non-Complex) (General Jurisdiction) case represented by Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General, Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack Apc, Meckler Bulger & Tilson, against Caremark Llc, Caremark Rx Llc, represented by Foley & Lardner Llp, Winston & Strawn Llp, in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Jane Johnson presiding.

Case Details for Cortes Victor v. Caremark Llc , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Jane Johnson

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

985 days

Filing Date

December 05, 2003

Category

Other Complaint (Non-Tort/Non-Complex) (General Jurisdiction)

Time To Trial

2432 days

Last Refreshed

February 18, 2021

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

1257 days

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Dismissed - Other

Case Cycle Time

2908 days

Parties for Cortes Victor v. Caremark Llc , et al.

Plaintiffs

Cortes Victor

Fowler Michael

Fowler Peppi

Nevarez Danny

The State Of California

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General

Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack Apc

Meckler Bulger & Tilson

Defendants

Caremark Llc

Caremark Rx Llc

Attorneys for Defendants

Foley & Lardner Llp

Winston & Strawn Llp

Other Parties

Stewart Elizabeth (Objector)

Strumwasser & Woocher Llp (Attorney For Legacy Party)

Strumwasser & Woocher Llp (Attorney For Objector)

Case Events for Cortes Victor v. Caremark Llc , et al.

Date Type Description
December 30, 2016 Docket Event Case Document - Public
September 27, 2016 Docket Event Case Document - Public
September 12, 2016 Docket Event Case Document - Public
December 23, 2011 Docket Event Case File
December 23, 2011 Docket Event Missing at time of scanning
December 16, 2011 Docket Event in Department 308
Non-Appearance Case Review
November 24, 2011 Docket Event Case File - Public
November 22, 2011 Hearing Order (AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE) )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
November 22, 2011 Hearing Order
Filed by The State of California (Plaintiff)
November 21, 2011 Hearing Order
Filed by The State of California (Plaintiff)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.