We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

X2Y Attenuators Vs Oldham & Oldham Co L P A

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

X2Y Attenuators, filed a(n) Declaratory Relief Only (General Jurisdiction) case represented by Conckle William C. Esq., against Oldham & Oldham Co. L.P.A., Hahn Loester & Parks Llp, in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk Courthouse with Lawrence W. Crispo presiding.

Case Details for X2Y Attenuators v. Oldham & Oldham Co. L.P.A. , et al.

Judge

Lawrence W. Crispo

Filing Date

September 10, 2003

Category

Declaratory Relief Only (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

February 18, 2021

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Case Outcome Type

Unknown Disposition

Case Cycle Time

489 days

Parties for X2Y Attenuators v. Oldham & Oldham Co. L.P.A. , et al.

Plaintiffs

X2Y Attenuators

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Conckle William C. Esq.

Defendants

Oldham & Oldham Co. L.P.A.

Hahn Loester & Parks Llp

Case Events for X2Y Attenuators v. Oldham & Oldham Co. L.P.A. , et al.

Type Description
Hearing Remittitur (DISMISSED REMITTITUR ISSUED ON 1-7-05 APPEAL FILED 2-17-04 IS DISMISSED S/T D-58 1-19-05 )
Filed by Clerk
Hearing Ntc to Atty re Notice of Appeal
Filed by Clerk
Hearing Notice of Appeal
Filed by Plaintiff
Docket Event in Department 58, Lawrence W. Crispo, Presiding
OSC RE Dismissal (OSC RE: DISMISSAL) - Case Dismissed/Disposed

Judge: Lawrence W. Crispo

Hearing Notice (OF DISMISSAL )
Filed by Defendant
Docket Event in Department 58, Lawrence W. Crispo, Presiding
Ruling on Submitted Matter (FROM 11-14-03) - Court makes order

Judge: Lawrence W. Crispo

Docket Event in Department 58, Lawrence W. Crispo, Presiding
Motion to Quash - Submitted

Judge: Lawrence W. Crispo

Hearing Reply to Motion (IN SUPPORT ITS MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION )
Filed by Defendant
Hearing Reply to Motion (IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION )
Filed by Defendant
Hearing Opposition Document (TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSNAL JURISDICTION )
Filed by Plaintiff
See all events