We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Brodbeck Vs. Daus

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Dennis Brodbeck, Executor Of The Will Of Gary Howard Kelsy, filed a(n) Unlawful Detainer - Property case represented by Burke, John J, Jr., against Daus, Richard, in the jurisdiction of Kern County. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts with Errea, Larry A. presiding.

Case Details for Dennis Brodbeck, Executor Of The Will Of Gary Howard Kelsy v. Daus, Richard

Judge

Errea, Larry A.

Filing Date

July 24, 2008

Category

32-Cl >10K <25K Unlawful Detainer - Residential-Civil Limit

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2021

Practice Area

Property

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

46 days

Filing Location

Kern County, CA

Matter Type

Unlawful Detainer

Case Cycle Time

2430 days

Parties for Dennis Brodbeck, Executor Of The Will Of Gary Howard Kelsy v. Daus, Richard

Plaintiffs

Dennis Brodbeck, Executor Of The Will Of Gary Howard Kelsy

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Burke, John J, Jr.

Defendants

Daus, Richard

Case Events for Dennis Brodbeck, Executor Of The Will Of Gary Howard Kelsy v. Daus, Richard

Type Description
Hearing Image of Archived Documents
Document Image
Docket Event Image of Archived Documents
Document Image
Hearing Rejection/Correction Notice
RETURNED JUDGMENT TO JOHN J BURKE, JR., ESQ.; PER MINUTE ORDER 08/26/08, YOU MUST SUBMIT STIPULATION AGREEMENT
Docket Event Rejection/Correction Notice
RETURNED JUDGMENT TO JOHN J BURKE, JR., ESQ.; PER MINUTE ORDER 08/26/08, YOU MUST SUBMIT STIPULATION AGREEMENT
Hearing NP1500
Department: 17 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: TRIAL BY COURT. PARTIES/COUNSEL STIPULATE TO COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: DENNIS BRODBECK, EXECUTOR OF THE WILL OF GARY HOWARD KELSY (PL-1) APPEARS WITH JOHN J BURKE JR. RICHARD DAUS (DE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. *************************************************************************************** PARTIES HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT/STIPULATION. THE DEFENDANT HAS AGREED TO VACATE ON THE DATE THE ESCROW CLOSES. PLAINTIFF TO GIVE DEFENDANT 3 DAY NOTICES PRIOR TO ESCROW CLOSING. UPON THE CLOSING OF ESCROW, THE DEFENDANT WILL BE GIVEN $500.00 DIRECTLY FROM ESCROW. IF THE DEFENDANT(S) FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE TERMS OF AGREEMENT, THEN UPON PLAINTIFF(S) DECLARATION OF DEFAULT, JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S) AGAINST DEFENDANT(S) AS FOLLOWS: FOR INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT FOR WRIT OF POSSESSION ONLY PLAINTIFF COUNSEL TO SUBMIT STIPULATION AGREEMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED: CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WITH THE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL.
Hearing 4151 Unlawful Detainer Trial - (N6a)
New Calendar
Hearing Unlawful Detainer Trial (Court)
RICHARD ANSWERED TRIAL T⁄E 1⁄2 HR

Judge: Errea, Larry A.

Docket Event 4151 Unlawful Detainer Trial - (N6a)
New Calendar
Docket Event Unlawful Detainer Trial (Court)
RICHARD ANSWERED TRIAL T⁄E 1⁄2 HR

Judge: Errea, Larry A.

Docket Event NP1500
Department: 17 Calendar Notes: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: TRIAL BY COURT. PARTIES/COUNSEL STIPULATE TO COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE CAME ON REGULARLY AT THIS TIME TODAY FOR HEARING WITH PARTIES AND COUNSEL PRESENT AS FOLLOWS: DENNIS BRODBECK, EXECUTOR OF THE WILL OF GARY HOWARD KELSY (PL-1) APPEARS WITH JOHN J BURKE JR. RICHARD DAUS (DE-1) APPEARS IN PROPRIA PERSONA. *************************************************************************************** PARTIES HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT/STIPULATION. THE DEFENDANT HAS AGREED TO VACATE ON THE DATE THE ESCROW CLOSES. PLAINTIFF TO GIVE DEFENDANT 3 DAY NOTICES PRIOR TO ESCROW CLOSING. UPON THE CLOSING OF ESCROW, THE DEFENDANT WILL BE GIVEN $500.00 DIRECTLY FROM ESCROW. IF THE DEFENDANT(S) FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE TERMS OF AGREEMENT, THEN UPON PLAINTIFF(S) DECLARATION OF DEFAULT, JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S) AGAINST DEFENDANT(S) AS FOLLOWS: FOR INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT FOR WRIT OF POSSESSION ONLY PLAINTIFF COUNSEL TO SUBMIT STIPULATION AGREEMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED: CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WITH THE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL.
See all events