Wells Fargo Bank Na,
filed a(n)
Landlord-Tenant -
Property
case
represented by
Yoder, Brian,
against
Brunson, Jermaine,
Williams, Tamika,
in the jurisdiction of Philadelphia County, PA, .
Philadelphia County, PA
Superior Courts
with ABBE F. FLETMAN presiding.
Case Details for
Wells Fargo Bank Na v. Brunson, Jermaine
, et al.
Case Events for
Wells Fargo Bank Na v. Brunson, Jermaine
, et al.
Date
Type
Description
September 02, 2024
Hearing
PROJECTED TRIAL DATE CITY HALL COURTROOM 602
Judge: ROBERTS, JOSHUA
December 01, 2023
Docket Event
NOTICE GIVEN UNDER RULE 236 NOTICE GIVEN ON 01-DEC-2023 OF CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ISSUED ENTERED ON 01-DEC-2023.
December 01, 2023
Docket Event
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ISSUED IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS PROJECTED TO BE LISTED FOR TRIAL DURING THE TRIAL MONTH BEGINNING 02-SEP-2024 AND COUNSEL SHOULD ANTICIPATE TRIAL TO BEGIN EXPEDITIOUSLY THEREAFTER. HOWEVER, COUNSEL AND THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE SUBSEQUENT NOTICE ATTACHING THEM TO A SPECIFIC TRIAL POOL MONTH AND SHOULD ANTICIPATE TRIAL TO BEGIN EXPEDITIOUSLY THEREAFTER. UPON RECEIPT OF THE TRIAL POOL ATTACHMENT NOTICE, ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE COURT IN WRITING OF ANY SCHEDULING CONFLICTS, INCLUDING TRIAL ATTACHMENTS AND PRE-PAID VACATIONS, AND ARE UNDER A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO NOTIFY THE COURT OF ANY SUBSEQUENT TRIAL ATTACHMENTS DURING THE TRIAL POOL MONTH. THE TRIAL CONFLICT LETTER MUST BE SUBMITTED NOT LATER THAN THE 20TH DAY OF THE MONTH PRIOR TO THE START OF THE TRIAL POOL MONTH. THE COURT WILL NOT RECOGNIZE ANY UNTIMELY CONFLICT NOTIFICATIONS. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE COURT OF ANY SCHEDULING CONFLICTS MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT IMPOSE APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE THE TRIAL POOL CONFLICT LETTER, ACCESS THE "EXISTING CASE" SECTION OF THE COURT'S ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM. SELECT "CONFERENCE SUBMISSIONS" AS THE FILING CATEGORY. SELECT "TRIAL POOL CONFLICT LETTER" AS THE DOCUMENT TYPE. IF THE CASE IS NOT CALLED FOR TRIAL DURING THE DESIGNATED TRIAL POOL MONTH, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE ASSIGNED TO THE NEXT TRIAL POOL MONTH AND EACH SUBSEQUENT TRIAL POOL MONTH UNTIL THE MATTER IS CALLED TO TRIAL. PARTIES ARE UNDER A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CONFLICT LETTERS BEFORE THE START OF EACH TRIAL POOL MONTH. AND NOW, THIS 01-DEC-2023 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. THE CASE MANAGEMENT AND TIME STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR EXPEDITED TRACK CASES SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO THIS CASE AND ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THIS ORDER. 2. ALL DISCOVERY IN THE ABOVE MATTER SHALL BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 06-MAY-2024. 3. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS MUST BE FILED NO LATER THAN 03-JUN-2024. TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF THE ASSIGNED TRIAL POOL MONTH, ALL COUNSEL SHALL SERVE UPON ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR OPPOSING PARTIES AND FILE WITH THE COURT, A PRE-TRIAL MEMORANDUM CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING: (a) A CONCISE SUMMARY OF THE NATURE OF THE CASE IF PLAINTIFF OR THE DEFENSE IF DEFENDANT OR ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT. (b) A LIST OF ALL WITNESSES WHO MAY BE CALLED TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL BY NAME AND ADDRESS. (c) A LIST OF ALL EXHIBITS THE PARTY INTENDS TO OFFER INTO EVIDENCE. COUNSEL SHOULD EXPECT ANY EXHIBIT NOT LISTED TO BE PRECLUDED AT TRIAL; (d) EACH COUNSEL SHALL PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TRIAL. ALL MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ELECTRONIC FILING PROCEDURES NOT LATER THAN 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF TRIAL. RESPONDING COUNSEL SHALL HAVE 10 DAYS AFTER SERVICE TO FILE ANY RESPONSE. FOR POOL CASES, THE START OF THE TRIAL IS DEFINED AS THE FIRST DAY OF THE TRIAL POOL LISTING. REQUESTS TO EXTEND ANY CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINE OR FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE MUST BE SUBMITTED BY FILING A MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF AND FILED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE DEADLINE IN QUESTION. ANY REQUESTS FOR A DATE-CERTAIN TRIAL LISTING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH SPECIFICITY, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR A LANGUAGE INTERPRETER, WITH A COPY TO OPPOSING PARTY, AND DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE ABBE F. FLETMAN, TEAM LEADER VIA THE COURT?S ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM, AS A TRIAL CONFLICT LETTER. HOWEVER, SAID REQUESTS MAY BE MADE ONLY UNDER EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES. IF A PARTY OR WITNESS REQUIRES A LANGUAGE INTERPRETER, IT IS THE OBLIGATION OF THE PARTY WITH THE REQUIREMENT TO REQUEST THE INTERPRETER FROM THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT REPORTER, DIGITAL RECORDING AND INTERPRETER ADMINISTRATION USING THE FORM FOUND AT: HTTPS://WWW.COURTS.PHILA.GOV/PDF/FORMS/COURT-REPORTERS/INTERPRETER-REQUEST-FORM.PDF. THE COURT WILL NOT GRANT CONTINUANCE REQUESTS WHEN COUNSEL OR AN UNREPRESENTED PARTY HAS FAILED TO TIMELY REQUEST A LANGUAGE INTERPRETER. ALL COUNSEL ARE UNDER A CONTINUING OBLIGATION AND ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER UPON ALL UNREPRESENTED PARTIES AND UPON ALL COUNSEL ENTERING AN APPEARANCE SUBSEQUENT TO THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. JOSHUA ROBERTS, J. 01-DEC-2023
December 01, 2023
Docket Event
LISTED FOR TRIAL none.
December 01, 2023
Docket Event
CASE MGMT CONFERENCE COMPLETED none.
August 25, 2023
Docket Event
WAITING TO LIST CASE MGMT CONF none.
August 08, 2023
Docket Event
NOTICE GIVEN UNDER RULE 236 NOTICE GIVEN ON 09-AUG-2023 OF ORDER/FAILED TO APPEAR ENTERED ON 08-AUG-2023.
August 08, 2023
Docket Event
ORDER-CONCILIATION CONCLUDED none.
August 08, 2023
Docket Event
ORDER/FAILED TO APPEAR UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT THIS MATTER IS REMOVED FROM THE CONCILIATION PROGRAM. ANY STAY IN EFFECT DUE TO BEING IN THE CONCILIATION PROGRAM IS LIFTED. THIS MATTER IS REMOVED FROM THE CONCILIATION PROGRAM FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR FOR A FIRST CONCILIATION CONFERENCE. PLAINTIFF CERTIFIES THAT THE COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAVE BEEN SERVED ON ALL DEFENDANTS AS REQUIRED BY THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THAT THE AFFIDAVIT(S) OF SERVICE REFLECTING THIS HAS/HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE DOCKET. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: DEFENDANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 9/25/2023 IF NO RESPONSE IS WITHIN SUCH TIME, THEN PLAINTIFF MUST THEREAFTER SEND A NOTICE OF ITS INTENTION TO TAKE DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO PA. R.C.P. 237.1 BEFORE TAKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE SCHEDULED. THE CONFERENCE DOES NOT ALTER THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT. ... BY THE COURT: S.T. STREET, J., 8/8/2023
