We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Sherry Ray Alexander, Etc. Vs. University Hospitals Health System, Et Al.

Case Last Refreshed: 5 months ago

Sherry Ray Alexander, filed a(n) Malpractice - Torts case represented by Jeffrey Michael Heller, Pamela E Pantages, William S Jacobson, against Adam N. Workman, Amelia A. Oaks, Emily Joann Arus, Eric L. Bryan, Jennie C. Champney, (total of 24) See All represented by Arthur O Kostendt, Christine Santoni, Emily Davis, Jeanne M Mullin, Matthew Turkalj, (total of 6) See All in the jurisdiction of Cuyahoga County, OH, . Cuyahoga County, OH Superior Courts with DEENA R CALABRESE presiding.

Case Details for Sherry Ray Alexander v. Adam N. Workman , et al.

Judge

DEENA R CALABRESE

Filing Date

March 10, 2023

Category

Tort-Medical Malpractice

Last Refreshed

December 04, 2023

Practice Area

Torts

Filing Location

Cuyahoga County, OH

Matter Type

Malpractice

Case Outcome Type

Re-Assigned

Case Complaint Summary

This complaint was filed by Sherry Ray Alexander, the husband of Stephanie Alexander, who is now deceased. Sherry Ray Alexander is the duly appointed Administrator of Stephanie Alexander's estate. The defendants in this case include Reddy Sreenivas S...

Parties for Sherry Ray Alexander v. Adam N. Workman , et al.

Plaintiffs

Sherry Ray Alexander

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Jeffrey Michael Heller

Pamela E Pantages

William S Jacobson

Defendants

Adam N. Workman

Amelia A. Oaks

Emily Joann Arus

Eric L. Bryan

Jennie C. Champney

Joanne Beers

Julie Ann Millhoff

Julie Ann Wells

Kaylee Elise Marez

Kelsey Irene Steen

Kyra Marie Sours

Madison Lyn Monroe

Matthew Allen Busek

Reddy Sreenivas Singashani

Robert D. Hudson

Safe Anesthesia Geneva, Llc

Shani Dawn Kissell

Sharad Prabhakantmani

Suzi P. Nestich

Tammy L. Kemble

Travis M. Landis

University Hospitals Health System, Inc. Dba University Hospitals Portage Medical Center

University Hospitals Medical Group, Inc.

Zachary R. Frailey

Attorneys for Defendants

Arthur O Kostendt

Christine Santoni

Emily Davis

Jeanne M Mullin

Matthew Turkalj

Ryan K. Rubin

Case Documents for Sherry Ray Alexander v. Adam N. Workman , et al.

PRETRIAL HELD ON 07/07/2023. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE APPEARED IN THESE CONSOLIDATED CASES PARTICIPATED BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. THE COURT NOTES THAT ACCORDING TO THE DOCKET, NO APPEARANCES HAVE BEEN MADE BY OR ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS ERIC L. BRYAN, ADAM N. WORKMAN, OR AMELIA A. OAKS, AND THAT SAID DEFENDANTS APPEAR TO BE IN DEFAULT. PLAINTIFF IS TO DISMISS CLAIMS AGAINST SAID DEFENDANTS OR FILE MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THIS ENTRY. FOLLOWING ANY ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE COURT WILL DEFER ANY DAMAGES HEARING UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE CASE. DUE TO CONSOLIDATION OF CASES AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE LITIGATION TIMELINE WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ALL FACT DISCOVERY, INCLUDING FACT WITNESS DEPOSITIONS, SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 10/20/2023. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT(S) DUE 11/01/2023. DEFENDANTS' EXPERT REPORT(S) DUE 01/12/2024. EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF IS 04/26/2024. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 01/16/2024. RESPONSE/REPLY DUE PER OHIO R. CIV. P. 6(C). THE COURT WILL RULE ON ANY PENDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NO LESS THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. AT THE REQUEST OF ANY PARTY, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT ORAL ARGUMENT ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ANY SUCH REQUEST MUST BE MADE BY SEPARATE MOTION AND NOT, E.G., BY ROTE ADDITION TO A PLEADING CAPTION. CLIENTS MUST BE PRESENT AT ORAL ARGUMENT, WHICH SHALL TAKE PLACE ON THE RECORD IN OPEN COURT. IN THE EVENT THAT PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT ORAL ARGUMENT WILL CREATE AN UNDUE HARDSHIP OR EXPENSE TO THE CLIENT, THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE CLIENT MAY MOVE THE COURT TO ALLOW THE CLIENT TO APPEAR LIVE VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE. CLIENTS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ATTEND BY TELEPHONE. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 04/18/2024 AT 11:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 05/13/2024 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER ON LITIGATION PREFERENCES, AVAILABLE AS OF THIS WRITING AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-DEENA-R-CALABRESE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO REVIEW THE STANDING ORDER REGULARLY FOR UPDATES. THE STANDING ORDER APPLIES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SUPERSEDED BY JOURNAL ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED

Date: July 10, 2023

CASE FILED: COMPLAINT

Date: March 10, 2023

Case Events for Sherry Ray Alexander v. Adam N. Workman , et al.

Type Description
FINAL PRETRIAL
Docket Event RECENT EVENT CANCELLATIONS APPEARING ON THE DOCKET WERE ENTERED FOR CALENDAR MAINTENANCE ONLY. THE FINAL PRETRIAL REMAINS SCHEDULED FOR 04/18/2024, AND THE TRIAL OF THESE CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS REMAINS SET FOR 05/13/2024. NOTICE ISSUED
JE
E-FILING SERVICE EMAIL
SAFE ANESTHESIA GENEVA, LLC
E-FILING SERVICE EMAIL
SHERRY RAY ALEXANDER
E-FILING SERVICE EMAIL
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. DBA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS PORTAGE MEDICAL CENTER
Docket Event MOTION FILED FOR P1 SHERRY RAY ALEXANDER PAMELA E PANTAGES 0046840 PLAINTIFF'S THIRD MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE TO SET A DISCOVERY RESPONSE DEADLINE
MO
Docket Event PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE TO SET A DISCOVERY RESPONSE DEADLINE, FILED 10/20/2023, IS DENIED AS MOOT. NOTICE ISSUED
JE
Docket Event NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 SHERRY RAY ALEXANDER FILED NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF MADISON MONROE, R.N.
NT
E-FILING SERVICE EMAIL
SAFE ANESTHESIA GENEVA, LLC
E-FILING SERVICE EMAIL
SHERRY RAY ALEXANDER
See all events