1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Sacramento County Superior Courts
  5. Timothy R Fisher Vs. Save Mart Supermarkets
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Timothy R Fisher Vs. Save Mart Supermarkets

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

filed a(n) Civil - Unlimited case in the jurisdiction of Sacramento County. This case was filed in Sacramento County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Timothy R Fisher Vs. Save Mart Supermarkets

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

November 22, 2016

Category

Civil - Unlimited

Last Refreshed

May 16, 2022

Filing Location

Sacramento County, CA

Case Events for Timothy R Fisher Vs. Save Mart Supermarkets

Date Type Description
March 04, 2019 Tentative Ruling No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including partie...

Judge: David W. Abbott
July 20, 2018 Tentative Ruling Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an Appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non-Compliance could result in Dismissal without ...

Judge: David W. Abbott
December 23, 2016 Tentative Ruling No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including partie...

Judge: Robert M. Twiss or Sharon A. Lueras
November 22, 2016 Tentative Ruling Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor Norguard Insurance Company's ("Intervenor") motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shal...

Judge: Kevin R. Culhane
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.