1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Sacramento County Superior Courts
  5. Joyce Brown Vs. Park Hill Place Apartments
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Joyce Brown Vs. Park Hill Place Apartments

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

filed a(n) Civil - Unlimited case in the jurisdiction of Sacramento County. This case was filed in Sacramento County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Joyce Brown Vs. Park Hill Place Apartments

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

September 30, 2016

Category

Civil - Unlimited

Last Refreshed

May 14, 2022

Filing Location

Sacramento County, CA

Case Events for Joyce Brown Vs. Park Hill Place Apartments

Date Type Description
January 12, 2017 Tentative Ruling Good cause appearing, plaintiff Joyce Brown's motion for a trial preference pursuant to CCP 36(a) is GRANTED. In accordance with CCP 36(f) this matter must be given a trial date on or before May 13, 2...

Judge: Robert C. Hight
September 30, 2016 Tentative Ruling No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including partie...

Judge: Peter Mering
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.