1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Orange County Superior Courts
  5. Marshall Vs Marshall
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Marshall Vs Marshall

Case Last Refreshed: 1 year ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

filed a(n) Civil case in the jurisdiction of Orange County. This case was filed in Orange County Superior Courts .

Case Details for Marshall Vs Marshall

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

September 28, 2020

Category

Civil

Last Refreshed

May 14, 2022

Filing Location

Orange County, CA

Case Events for Marshall Vs Marshall

Date Type Description
April 26, 2021 Tentative Ruling Defendant’s demurrers are SUSTAINED with leave to amend, except as set forth below. The motion to strike is treated as MOOT. Demurrer to the 1st COA for Breach of Contract is sustained with leave to a...

Judge: David HOFFER
March 01, 2021 Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Suzanne Marshall’s motion to compel further responses to a request for production (“RFP”) directed to defendant Timothy Marshall is GRANTED. The subject RFPs 2 through 7 are fairly targeted ...

Judge: David HOFFER
February 01, 2021 Tentative Ruling Continued

Judge: David HOFFER
October 26, 2020 Tentative Ruling Demurrers to the First Amended Complaint are, in part, SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND and, in part, OVERRULED as set forth more fully below. The Motion to strike is deemed MOOT. The amended complaint i...

Judge: David HOFFER
September 28, 2020 Tentative Ruling Continued to 10/26/2020

Judge: David HOFFER
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.