1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. Massachusetts
  4. Hampshire County Superior Courts
  5. Fondakowski V Bowditch, Llc Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Fondakowski V Bowditch, Llc Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Fondakowski, Mitchell J., filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Kaplan, Esq., Stephen R, against Mcloughlin, William H., Bowditch, Llc, represented by Murphy, Esq., Timothy F, in the jurisdiction of Hampshire County, MA, . Hampshire County, MA Superior Courts .

Case Details for Fondakowski, Mitchell J. v. Mcloughlin, William H. , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Filing Date

January 11, 2013

Category

Contract / Business Cases

Last Refreshed

April 10, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Filing Location

Hampshire County, MA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Parties for Fondakowski, Mitchell J. v. Mcloughlin, William H. , et al.

Plaintiffs

Fondakowski, Mitchell J.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Kaplan, Esq., Stephen R

Defendants

Mcloughlin, William H.

Bowditch, Llc

Attorneys for Defendants

Murphy, Esq., Timothy F

Case Events for Fondakowski, Mitchell J. v. Mcloughlin, William H. , et al.

Date Type Description
December 06, 2013 Docket Event Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, without costs
December 04, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#54) DENIED (Mary-Lou Rup) Notices mailed 12/6/2013
December 04, 2013 Docket Event Defendant Bowditch, LLC, William H. McLoughlin's MOTION for Directed Verdict at close of all the evidence
December 04, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#53) DENIED as to all claims.(Mary-Lou Rup) Notices mailed 12/6/2013
December 04, 2013 Docket Event Defendant Bowditch, LLC, William H. McLoughlin's MOTION for Directed Verdict at close of plaintiff's evidence.
December 03, 2013 Docket Event Plaintiff Mitchell J. Fondakowski's MOTION for leave to proffer evidence; and offer of proof
December 02, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#45) ALLOWED as to any complaints, citations after the plaintiff ceased working in Nov. 2010. Allowed with respect to such evidence prior ro 11/7/10, unless this evidence is shown to be relevant and admissible(Mary-Lou Rup) Notices mailed 12/6/2013
December 02, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#44) As to "Beloved Earth's" evidence reagrding the amount of hours/hourly rate(s), court will conduct a voir dire of witness(es). (Mary-Lou Rup). Notices mailed 12/6/2013
December 02, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#43) ALLOWED (Plaintiff seeks to introduce evidence of rents to support Bd. of Labor Statistics evidence, which has been excluded. He also seeks to introduce evidence of landlords intention to raise the rents in 2012, to show Northampton is an "expensive" city.) (Mary-Lou Rup) Notices mailed 12/6/2013
December 02, 2013 Docket Event Motion (P#42) (1) As to Housing Court judgment, allowed, without prejudice. During time period at issue in that case, plaintiff no longer performed janitorial services. Plaintiff and other witnessess will testify to their personal observations if the condition of the premises during the time perior (prior to 11/7/10) that the plaintiff performed such servuces. (2) As to employment and wage estimates, under advisement. (3) As to plaintiff's medical condition (exema), which he contends worened as a result of working under "harsh and rigorous" conditions, allowed. Plaintff may testify about his physical symptoms and circumstances under which his condition worsened or his sympotoms and circumstances under which his condition worsened of his symptoms occured. An expert witness is not necessary for that purpose. (Mary-Lou Rup). Notices mailed 12/6/2013
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.