1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Santa Clara County Superior Courts
  5. Trend Micro Incorporated V. Fortinet, Inc.
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Trend Micro Incorporated V. Fortinet, Inc.

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Trend Micro Incorporated, A California Corporation, Trend Micro Incorporated, A Japanese Corporation, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case against Fortinet, Inc., represented by Marc Nathan Bernstein, in the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County. This case was filed in Santa Clara County Superior Courts Santa Clara with James P. Kleinberg presiding.

Case Details for Trend Micro Incorporated, A California Corporation v. Fortinet, Inc. , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

James P. Kleinberg

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

December 02, 2001

Category

Breach Of Contract/Warranty Unlimited(06)

Last Refreshed

December 01, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

270 days

Filing Location

Santa Clara County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filing Court House

Santa Clara

Parties for Trend Micro Incorporated, A California Corporation v. Fortinet, Inc. , et al.

Plaintiffs

Trend Micro Incorporated, A California Corporation

Trend Micro Incorporated, A Japanese Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Fortinet, Inc.

Attorneys for Defendants

Marc Nathan Bernstein

Case Events for Trend Micro Incorporated, A California Corporation v. Fortinet, Inc. , et al.

Date Type Description
January 17, 2012 Hearing Court Trial: Long Cause

Judge: Department 8
January 11, 2012 Hearing Conference: Settlement

Judge: Department 1
January 05, 2012 Docket Event Stipulation and Order
Text = #G-38386 Stip & Order of Dismissal (in its entirety with prejudice) - signed by Judge James P. Kleinberg Legacy Name = CV Stip/Order Decision = M Closed = 01/05/2012
December 21, 2011 Hearing Pretrial Conference

Judge: Department 1
December 16, 2011 Hearing Motion: Summary Judgment/Adjudication
December 09, 2011 Docket Event Lodged Under Seal
Text = reply in support of its mtn that as a matter of law, the parties agreement preserves Fortinet's right to challenge patent validity. 12-16-11 9am dept.1 Legacy Name = CV Lodged under Seal Decision = M Closed = 12/09/2011

Judge: James P. Kleinberg
December 09, 2011 Docket Event Notice
Text = NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF FORTINET INC.?S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION THAT AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE PARTIES? AGREEMENT PRESERVES FORTINET?S RIGHT TO CHALLENGE PATENT VALIDITY #G-37655 Legacy Name = CV Ntc of... Decision = M Closed = 12/09/2011
December 09, 2011 Docket Event Appendix
Text = #G-37655 APPENDIX OF SELECTED NON-CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF FORTINET, INC.?S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION THAT AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE PARTIES? AGREEMENT PRESERVES FORTINET?S RIGHT TO CHALLENGE PATENT VALIDITY Legacy Name = CV Appendix Decision = M Closed = 12/09/2011
December 09, 2011 Docket Event Lodged Under Seal
Text = Will B. Fitton declaration in support of Fortinet, Inc.'s reply in support of its mtn that as a matter of law, the parties' agreement preserves Fortinets' right to challenge patent validity Legacy Name = CV Lodged under Seal Decision = M Closed = 12/09/2011
December 09, 2011 Docket Event Proof of Service
Legacy Name = CV Proof of Svc Decision = M Closed = 12/09/2011
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.