1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Butte County Superior Courts
  5. Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Documents Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Last Refreshed: 7 months ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Solinsky, Frank, filed a(n) Civil case against Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development, City Council Of Chico, City Of Chico, represented by Jared, Andrew Lee, in the jurisdiction of Butte County. This case was filed in Butte County Superior Courts with Tamara L. Mosbarger presiding.

Case Details for Solinsky, Frank v. Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Tamara L. Mosbarger

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Time To Management

135 days

Filing Date

November 04, 2019

Category

Civil

Last Refreshed

November 20, 2023

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

219 days

Filing Location

Butte County, CA

Case Cycle Time

317 days

Parties for Solinsky, Frank v. Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development , et al.

Plaintiffs

Solinsky, Frank

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development

City Council Of Chico

City Of Chico

Attorneys for Defendants

Jared, Andrew Lee

Other Parties

Mcneill, Walter Patterson (Attorney)

Case Documents for Solinsky, Frank v. Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development , et al.

for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Request

Date: November 08, 2019
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: March 10, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: March 11, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Answer - Response - Denial - Unlimited

Date: March 16, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Notice of Entry of Judgment, Order or Ruling

Date: June 17, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Conference

Date: March 18, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: June 08, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Answer - Response - Denial - Unlimited

Date: March 16, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: May 26, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Notice

Date: November 08, 2019
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

3-20-2020 Addendum to Order re Court Operations and Access

Date: March 20, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Conference

Date: June 10, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Case Management Statement

Date: March 04, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Petition Hearing

Date: March 04, 2020
for Solinsky, Frank Vs City Of Chico Et Al

Complaint

Date: November 04, 2019

Case Events for Solinsky, Frank v. Brendan Vieg - Chico Director Of Community Development , et al.

Date Type Description
September 16, 2020 Docket Event Case Management Conference
Continued from 6/10/2020

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Proof of Mailing
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Order After Hearing on Petitioner's Motion for Attorney's Fees
Order

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Case Under Submission for Decision
Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney Fees from 9/2/2020 Under Submission

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Civil Minutes
Minute Order
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Tentative Ruling
The hearing on Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees has been continued to 9/02/20 to allow Petitioner to present oral argument. The Court's tentative ruling is as follows: Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 is denied for failure to establish the litigation resulted in the enforcement of an important right which conferred a significant public benefit. (See, Canyon Crest Conservancy v. County of Los Angeles (2020) 46 Cal. App. 5th 398.) Real Party in Interest's withdrawal of its application and Respondent's revocation of OPDI 19-01 does not prohibit the issuance of a subsequent OPDI on another application for a different location in the future. Respondent shall prepare a form of Order.
September 02, 2020 Docket Event Response to Objection Re oral Argument on Motion for Attorney's Fees; Declaration in Support
Motion hearings - Predispo
Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney Fees

Judge: Mosbarger, Tamara L
August 28, 2020 Docket Event Response to Objection Re oral Argument on Motion for Attorney's Fees; Declaration in Support
Response - No Fee
Response to Objection Re oral Argument on Motion for Attorney's Fees; Declaration of McNeil in Support
August 19, 2020 Docket Event Tentative Ruling
Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 is denied for failure to establish the litigation resulted in the enforcement of an important right which conferred a significant public benefit. (See, Canyon Crest Conservancy v. County of Los Angeles (2020) 46 Cal. App. 5th 398.) Real Party in Interest's withdrawal of its application and Respondent's revocation of OPDI 19-01 does not prohibit the issuance of a subsequent OPDI on another application for a different location in the future. Respondent shall prepare a form of Order.
August 19, 2020 Docket Event Civil Minutes
Minute Order
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.