We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Eddie Surrell Vs Carla Soto

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Surrell, Eddie, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Soto, Carla, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with David C. Kalemkarian presiding.

Case Details for Surrell, Eddie v. Soto, Carla

Judge

David C. Kalemkarian

Filing Date

September 12, 2018

Category

Dissolution - Minor Children

Last Refreshed

March 16, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

112 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Parties for Surrell, Eddie v. Soto, Carla

Plaintiffs

Surrell, Eddie

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Soto, Carla

Other Parties

Surrell, Azari (Minor)

Case Events for Surrell, Eddie v. Soto, Carla

Type Description
Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David

Docket Event Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
Docket Event Summons issued and filed
1st Amended
Docket Event Amended Petition
1st Amended
Docket Event Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
documents placed in Returned Default Tickler under S
Docket Event Documents sent to
Default w/judgment (drop Box) and envelopes sent to Default desk
Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Kalemkarian, David

Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
HRG: 10/9/2019 Judicial Officer: D Kalemkarian Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Bailiff: D. Cervantes-Johnson Reporter: Not Reported Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 4/15/2020 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
Docket Event Return Letter
Reason: Proof of Service of Summons (FL-115): filed 10/01/18 is defective at section #2 -incomplete address of service Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (FL-105) filed 9/12/18 is defective at section 6- not dated. Request to Enter Default (FL-165) is defective at case number not added to form. Section 5 - incomplete/not dated or signed.
Docket Event Request to Enter Default Denied
Reason: Proof of Service of Summons (FL-115): filed 10/01/18 is defective at section #2 -incomplete address of service Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (FL-105) filed 9/12/18 is defective at section 6- not dated. Request to Enter Default (FL-165) is defective at case number not added to form. Section 5 - incomplete/not dated or signed.
See all events