Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago
Surrell, Eddie, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Soto, Carla, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with David C. Kalemkarian presiding.
Case Number |
||
Filing DateSeptember 12, 2018 |
CategoryDissolution - Minor Children |
|
Last RefreshedMarch 16, 2021 |
Practice AreaFamily |
Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions112 days |
Filing LocationFresno County, CA |
Matter TypeDivorce,Separation |
|
Date | Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
March 16, 2021 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge: Kalemkarian, David |
|
June 23, 2020 | Docket Event | Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act | |
June 23, 2020 | Docket Event |
Summons issued and filed 1st Amended |
|
June 23, 2020 | Docket Event |
Amended Petition 1st Amended |
|
November 18, 2019 | Docket Event |
Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing documents placed in Returned Default Tickler under S |
|
November 15, 2019 | Docket Event |
Documents sent to Default w/judgment (drop Box) and envelopes sent to Default desk |
|
October 09, 2019 | Docket Event |
1 Family - Centered Status Conference
Judge: Kalemkarian, David |
|
October 09, 2019 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached HRG: 10/9/2019 Judicial Officer: D Kalemkarian Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Bailiff: D. Cervantes-Johnson Reporter: Not Reported Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 4/15/2020 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner. |
|
February 11, 2019 | Docket Event |
Return Letter Reason: Proof of Service of Summons (FL-115): filed 10/01/18 is defective at section #2 -incomplete address of service Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (FL-105) filed 9/12/18 is defective at section 6- not dated. Request to Enter Default (FL-165) is defective at case number not added to form. Section 5 - incomplete/not dated or signed. |
|
January 02, 2019 | Docket Event |
Request to Enter Default Denied Reason: Proof of Service of Summons (FL-115): filed 10/01/18 is defective at section #2 -incomplete address of service Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (FL-105) filed 9/12/18 is defective at section 6- not dated. Request to Enter Default (FL-165) is defective at case number not added to form. Section 5 - incomplete/not dated or signed. |
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.